Cited by 4Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Depression in Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Zamani, Elham, Moatamedy, Abdollah, Bakhtiari, Maryam·2021·New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on depression in patients with Multiple Sclerosis( MS) .This research was carried out based on questionnaire survey and Beck Depression Inventory. The method of the experimental design of pretest - posttest control group design was used. The respondents of the survey were chosen from members of MS Tehran and classified in two experimental/control groups. The data were analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS).Results showed that pre-test and post-test scores of depression in patients with MS significantly different (P <0.05) and follow-up (P <0.01) .In other words, reduce depressive symptoms in patients with MS in the test in follow up period has survived.It can be concluded that treatment acceptance and commitment therapy is effective in reducing depression in patients with multiple sclerosis.Â

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18844/prosoc.v3i2.1599

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]5. Churchill Livingstone, London. In M.J. AMINOFF, F. BOLLER, D.F. SWAAB, (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  2. [6]6. Gelfand, J.M. (2014). Multiple sclerosis: Diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and clinical presentation. In M.J. AMINOFF, F. BOLLER, D.F. SWAAB, (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  3. [17]17. Pirkhaefi, A. & Nida, S. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy for OCD, and depression: A Case Study. Journal of Behavioral sciences in Asia, 1(2), pp. 16-25.
  4. [21]21. In M.J. AMINOFF, F. BOLLER, D.F. SWAAB, (Eds.). Handbook of Clinical Neurology. The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Authors
Zamani, E., Moatamedy, A., & Bakhtiari, M.
Affiliations
Allameh Tabataba'i University (IR)
Venue
New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2021-03-27
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
53-58
ISSN
2547-8818 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612241551
Cited by
2
References
20
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, depression, multiple sclerosis, depressive symptoms, psychological intervention, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review