Cited by 33Community Health and DevelopmentPublic Health Policies and EducationService-Learning and Community Engagement

Community Partnering for Behavioral Health Equity: Public Agency and Community Leaders’ Views of its Promise and Challenge

Open access
Bromley, Elizabeth, Figueroa, Chantal, Castillo, Enrico G., Kadkhoda, Farbod, Chung, Bowen, Miranda, Jeanne, Menon, Kumar, Whittington, Yolanda +3 more·2018·Ethnicity & Disease

Abstract

Objective: To understand potential for multi-sector partnerships among com­munity-based organizations and publicly funded health systems to implement health improvement strategies that advance health equity.Setting: In 2014, the Los Angeles County (LAC) Board of Supervisors approved the Health Neighborhood Initiative (HNI) that aims to: 1) improve coordination of health services for behavioral health clients across safety-net providers within neighborhoods; and 2) address social determinants of health through community-driven, public agency sponsored partnerships with community-based organizations.Design: Key stakeholder interviewing dur­ing HNI planning and early implementation to elicit perceptions of multi-sector partner­ships and innovations required for partner­ships to achieve system transformation and health equity.Participants: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews with 49 leaders from LAC health systems, community-based organizations; and payers.Main Outcomes Means: Grounded the­matic analysis of interview data.Results: Leaders perceived partnerships within and beyond health systems as transformative in their potential to: improve access, value, and efficiency; align priori­ties of safety-net systems and communities; and harness the power of communities to impact health. Leaders identified trust as critical to success in partnerships but named lack of time for relationship-building, limitations in service capacity, and ques­tions about sustainability as barriers to trust-building. Leaders described the need for procedural innovations within health systems that would support equitable part­nerships including innovations that would increase transparency and normalize infor­mation exchange, share agenda-setting and decision-making power with partners, and institutionalize partnering through training and accountability.Conclusions: Leaders described improv­ing procedural justice in public agencies’ relationships with communities as key to effective partnering for health eq­uity.Ethn Dis.2018;28(Suppl 2):397-406; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.397.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18865/ed.28.s2.397

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expertise of community leaders and other stakeholders can be integrated equitably with that of researchers with trust, respect, and two-way knowledge exchange.

    “The expertise of community leaders and other stakeholders can be integrated equitably with that of researchers with trust, respect, and two-way knowledge exchange [134, 135].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [18]18. Bernard HR, Ryan GW. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. [19]19. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler M. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. 2nd ed San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. [23]23. Wendel ML, Burdine JN, McLeroy KR, Alaniz A, Norton B, Felix MR. Community capacity: theory and application. In DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds: Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. 2009;2:277-302.
  4. [29]29. Thibaut JW, Walker L. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1975. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bromley, E., Figueroa, C., Castillo, E. G., Kadkhoda, F., Chung, B., Miranda, J., Menon, K., Whittington, Y., Jones, F., Wells, K. B., & Kataoka, S. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (US)
  • Healthy African American Families II (US)
Venue
Ethnicity & Disease
Published
2018-09-06
Volume
28
Issue
Supp
Pages
397-406
ISSN
  • 1049-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0826
OpenAlex
W2889874513
Cited by
33
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnicity & Disease (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061570, R01MH078853)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD007721)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Keywords
health equity, intersectoral collaboration, behavioral health, safety-net health system, community organizations, public agencies, Los Angeles County, social determinants of health, trust building, procedural justice, stakeholder perspectives, health system transformation
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Intersectoral Collaboration, Humans, Mental Health, Residence Characteristics, Social Justice, United States, Quality Improvement, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review