The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DEFINING A PLANT'S BELOWGROUND ZONE OF INFLUENCE
Open accessAbstract
The concept of a zone of influence, the area over which a plant alters the environment, forms the basis of many models of plant competition. Because of logistical difficulties, we actually know little about the sizes and shapes of zones of influence belowground. Here we advocate obtaining data on plants' belowground zones of influence, including the length and distribution of lateral roots, in order to understand better how plants respond to their abiotic soil environment and to other plants. We provide several examples from recent work. First, we present an analysis of a large global data set which shows that maximum lateral root spread correlates with canopy size but that, for a given canopy size, maximum lateral root spread is greater in arid environments and in coarse textured soils. Second, we use an experiment with the weedy annual Abutilon theophrasti to show how using nutrient analogs as tracers yields information about lateral root distributions within populations. In our experimental populations, the belowground zone of influence extended well beyond the closest neighboring plants. Overlap in zones of influence increased in nutrient patches. Third, we propose a new conceptual model of belowground zones of influence based on these and other data sets. The model assumes that the probability of resource uptake or competing with a particular neighbor declines with distance from the stem but that considerable uptake at great distances from the stem is still possible. It also allows for plasticity in root distributions as might occur in spatially heterogeneous soils. Finally, we suggest how better information on the shapes and sizes of belowground zones of influence will help develop a more predictive framework for understanding plant competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities
Bardgett, R. D., & Wardle, D. A. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0274 · Cited by 1,173
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Root competition: beyond resource depletion
SCHENK, H. J. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x · Cited by 587
Self-citationRhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition
Lynch, J. P., Ho, M. D., & phosphorus, L. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4 · Cited by 451
An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics
Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Scheller, R. M., & Spies, T. A. (2012) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.02.015 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Casper, B. B., Schenk, H. J., & Jackson, R. B.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2313-2321
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111782725
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEFINING A PLANT'S BELOWGROUND ZONE OF INFLUENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-0287
- The paper
- Casper, B. B., Schenk, H. J., & Jackson, R. B. (2003). DEFINING A PLANT'S BELOWGROUND ZONE OF INFLUENCE. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.