The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that plant–pollinator interactions may be less specialized than previously thought. We contrasted patterns of specialization observed in five plant–pollinator interaction webs with predictions based on null models. In the five data sets, the observed number of extreme specialists and extreme generalists was significantly higher than the null expectation. This pattern was mostly due to a positive correlation between species frequency of interaction (f) and their estimated degree of generalization (s). After accounting for this association, the expected frequency distribution of degree of specialization generated by the null model closely matched the observed frequency distribution in the five data sets. A second null model, which explicitly incorporated the correlation between f and s, also generated expected frequency distributions of specialization that closely resemble those observed in the data sets. To make progress in understanding the distribution of degree of specialization in pollination systems it will be necessary not only to improve the quality of the data and to refine methods used to quantify specialization, but also to answer the question of why more frequently interacting species appear to be more generalized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Clements, F. E., & Long, F. L. (1923) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.20274 · Cited by 56
Cited by
The modularity of pollination networks
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104 · Cited by 2,639
Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B. (2009) · The Open Ecology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874213000902010007 · Cited by 1,772
Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M., & Price, M. V. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2909 · Cited by 1,238
Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L., & Aizen, M. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x · Cited by 1,079
Self-citationInvasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs
Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L., & Morales, J. M. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060031 · Cited by 485
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vázquez, D. P., & Aizen, M. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2493-2501
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158649873
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-0587
- The paper
- Vázquez, D. P., & Aizen, M. A. (2003). NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.