Cited by 507Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

Psychological Abuse: A Variable Deserving Critical Attention in Domestic Violence

O’Leary, K. Daniel·1999·Violence and Victims

Abstract

Policy makers and researchers give psychological abuse considerably less attention than physical abuse in the partner abuse area. One reason for the relative neglect of psychological abuse is that there are difficulties in arriving at a common definition of psychological abuse that might be useful to both the mental health and legal professions. Another reason for the relative neglect of psychological abuse has been an implicit assumption that physical abuse exacts a greater psychological toll on victims than does psychological abuse. At the extreme level of physical abuse, this assumption seems defensible, but at levels of physical aggression that are most common in marriage and long-term relationships, psychological abuse appears to have as great an impact as physical abuse. Even direct ratings of psychological and physical abuse by women in physically abusive relationships indicate that psychological abuse has a greater adverse effect on them than physical abuse. Retrospective reports, longitudinal research, and treatment dropout research all provide evidence that psychological abuse can exact a negative effect on relationships that is as great as that of physical abuse. Finally, psychological abuse almost always precedes physical abuse, so that prevention and treatment efforts clearly need to address psychological abuse. Eight measures of various forms of psychological abuse that have reasonable psychometric properties and considerable construct validity are reviewed and a definition of psychological abuse in intimate relations is provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Domestic violence has long been recognised by scholars as an issue of power and control as much as physical violence and coercion.

    “Domestic violence has long been recognised by scholars as being an issue of power and control as much as it is one of physical violence and coercion (Dobash & Dobash, 1992; Gondolf, 2007; O'Leary, 1999; Øverlien, 2013) .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Leary, K. D.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
O’Leary, K. Daniel
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
1999-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
3-23
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W2101031831
Cited by
507
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh047801-01a3)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH47801, MH-57985, R01MH057985)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
psychological violence, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, physical abuse, psychological impact of abuse, treatment discontinuation, abuse prevention, women in abusive relationships, construct validity
MeSH terms
Aggression, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Marriage, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Research Design, Spouse Abuse, Verbal Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Battered Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review