Cited by 155Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The dark triad and intimate partner violence

Open access
Carton, Hannah, Egan, Vincent·2017·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.040

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carton, H., & Egan, V.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Egan, Vincent
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
105
Pages
84-88
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2525296196
Cited by
155
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
Dark Triad, intimate partner violence, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, agreeableness, psychopathy, narcissism, incremental validity, personality traits, emotional abuse, conflict tactics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review