Cited by 19Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

Intimate Partner Violence in Belgium: Prevalence, Individual Health Outcomes, and Relational Correlates

Open access
Hellemans, Sabine, Buysse, Ann, De Smet, Olivia, Wietzker, Anne·2014·Psychologica Belgica

Abstract

Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) using national samples is important to guide prevention efforts. However, the latest prevalence estimates for Belgium date from more than ten years ago. Therefore, this study used population-based cross-sectional data (N = 1,472) to assess to what extent adult women and men in Belgium experienced psychological, physical or sexual violence from their current partner in the last year. Next to assessing the association with individual health correlates, we explored the association between IPV and relationship quality. The annual prevalence of physical IPV in a current relationship was 1.3%. Only women experienced sexual IPV (0.3%). Fourteen percent of the respondents reported psychological violence and no differences were noted between women and men. Victims of psychological IPV reported adverse mental health outcomes and the effect was stronger for women than for men. Additionally, psychological victimization was associated with a diminished level of relationship quality, but no gender differences were noted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/pb.af

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellemans, S., Buysse, A., De Smet, O., & Wietzker, A.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Hellemans, Sabine
  • Wietzker, Anne
Venue
Psychologica Belgica
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
79-96
ISSN
  • 0033-2879 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-670X
OpenAlex
W2165472838
Cited by
19
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychologica Belgica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Psychologica Belgica (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, prevalence, psychological violence, physical violence, sexual violence, relationship quality, mental health outcomes, gender differences, Belgium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review