CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and InterventionsBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Youth Violence Trajectories and Proximal Characteristics of Intimate Partner Violence

Herrenkohl, Todd I., Kosterman, Rick, Mason, W. Alex, Hawkins, J. David·2007·Violence and Victims
DOI 10.1891/088667007780842793
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Analyses first examined the developmental course of intimate partner violence (IPV), beginning with trajectories of youth violence. We then examined potential mediators of prior youth violence trajectories in models predicting later IPV perpetration as an outcome. Potential mediators include risks associated with the individual (e.g., current alcohol and drug use and mental health diagnosis), characteristics of a perpetrator’s partner (e.g., use of alcohol/drugs and history of antisocial behavior), and aspects of the surrounding community (e.g., neighborhood norms favorable to violence and drug use). Data are from the Seattle Social Development Project, a longitudinal study of over 800 individuals followed from elementary school to young adulthood (age 24). Findings suggest that both chronic and late-increaser patterns of youth violence elevated the likelihood of later IPV perpetration. Partial mediation effects of the relation between youth violence and IPV were found for variables related to one’s partner and the surrounding community. Individual characteristics of the perpetrator were not uniquely predictive of IPV when measured as a risk index and modeled along with other risk factors. Findings indicate that the risk of IPV could be lessened by addressing earlier forms of violence and by intervening to reduce risks within and across domains of influence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/088667007780842793

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Herrenkohl, T. I., Kosterman, R., Mason, W. A., & Hawkins, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Venue
Violence and Victims
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Published
2007-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
259-274
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
DOI
10.1891/088667007780842793
OpenAlex
W2008154082
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH056587, 1R24MH56587)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
intimate partner violence, youth violence, chronic violence, mediation, alcohol and drug use, psychiatric diagnosis, antisocial behavior, community risk factors, Seattle Social Development Project
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Juvenile Delinquency, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Socioeconomic Factors, Spouse Abuse, Washington, Risk Assessment, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review