Cited by 38Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Presleep Cognitive Activity and Thought Control Strategies in Insomnia

Bélanger, Lynda, Morin, Charles M., Gendron, Linda, Blais, France C.·2005·Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine presleep cognitive activity and thought control strategies used by individuals with insomnia, with and without comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and by good sleepers. Fifty participants were divided into the following comparison groups: (a) individuals with insomnia alone (n = 14), (b) individuals with insomnia and comorbid GAD (n = 16), and (c) good sleepers (n = 20). Participants completed a standardized evaluation including interviews and questionnaires on insomnia, anxiety, presleep cognitive activity, and thought control strategies. Results showed that individuals with insomnia and comorbid GAD reported greater presleep cognitive arousal than individuals with insomnia alone, who in turn reported greater cognitive arousal than good sleepers. Results also showed that individuals with insomnia and comorbid GAD used avoidance as a mean of controlling disturbing presleep cognitions more frequently than the other two groups. Both groups of individuals with insomnia evaluated their presleep thought control strategies as being less effective than good sleepers did. These results support the assertion that higher presleep cognitive arousal plays a role in insomnia and, by distinguishing individuals with insomnia alone (i.e., without comorbid anxiety disorders) from individuals with comorbid GAD, this study further suggests that higher cognitive arousal in individuals with insomnia is not necessarily accounted for by high rates of comorbidity between insomnia and GAD. The main clinical implication of these findings is that the evaluation and treatment of insomnia should consider these cognitive features in order to optimize outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/jcop.19.1.19.66330

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bélanger, L., Morin, C. M., Gendron, L., & Blais, F. C.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2005-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-887X
OpenAlex
W2102712468
Cited by
38
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
insomnia, thought control strategies, cognitive arousal, generalized anxiety disorder, comorbidities, avoidance, sleep onset, good sleepers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review