The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting the degradation of pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals may be released to the soil environment through the application of biosolids to land. To understand those factors affecting the persistence of pharmaceuticals in the soil environment, the present study was performed to assess the effects of soil type, the presence of biosolids, and the impact of chemical mixture interactions on the degradation of three pharmaceuticals: naproxen, carbamazepine, and fluoxetine. Single-compound studies showed that naproxen degraded in a range of soils with half-lives ranging from 3.1 to 6.9 d and in biosolids with a half-life of 10.2 d. No relationships were observed between degradation rate and soil physicochemical properties and soil bioactivity. For naproxen, addition of biosolids to soils reduced the degradation rate observed in the soil-only studies, with half-lives in the soil-biosolid systems ranging from 3.9 to 15.1 d. Carbamazepine and fluoxetine were found to be persistent in soils, biosolids, and soil-biosolid mixtures. When degradation was assessed using a mixture of the three study compounds and the sulfonamide antibiotic sulfamethazine, the degradation behavior of fluoxetine and carbamazepine was similar to that observed in the single compound studies (i.e., no degradation). However, the degradation rate of naproxen in soils, biosolids, and soil-biosolid systems spiked with the mixture was significantly slower than in the single-compound studies. As degradation studies for risk assessment purposes are performed using single substances in soil-only studies, it is possible that current risk assessment procedures will underestimate environmental impacts. Further work is therefore warranted on a larger range of substances, soils, biosolid types, and chemical mixtures to better understand the fate of pharmaceuticals in terrestrial systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140 · cited 1×
“investigated over the past 10 years [10–13].”
Göbel, A., Thomsen, A., McArdell, C. S., Joss, A., & Giger, W. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es048550a · Cited by 760
Cited by
Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What Are the Big Questions?
Boxall, A. B. A., Rudd, M. A., Brooks, B. W., Caldwell, D. J., Choi, K., Hickmann, S., Innes, E., Ostapyk, K., Staveley, J. P., Verslycke, T., et al. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104477 · Cited by 1,363
Self-citationFate of antibiotics in soil and their uptake by edible crops
Pan, M., & Chu, L. M. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.214 · Cited by 423
Walters, E., McClellan, K., & Halden, R. U. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.051 · Cited by 366
Wu, X., Conkle, J. L., Ernst, F., & Gan, J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502868k · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteiro, S. C., & Boxall, A. B. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2546-2554
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2065124034
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting the degradation of pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/08-657.1
- The paper
- Monteiro, S. C., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2009). Factors affecting the degradation of pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/08-657.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.