The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the utility of a brief (5‐min) stimulus preference assessment for individuals with developmental disabilities. Participants had noncontingent (free) access to an array of stimuli and could interact with any of the stimuli at any time. Stimuli were never withdrawn or withheld from the participants during a 5‐min session. In Experiment 1, the brief preference assessment was conducted for 10 participants to identify differentially preferred stimuli, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to test the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli identified as highly preferred. In Experiment 2, a comparison was conducted between the brief preference assessment and a commonly used paired‐stimulus preference assessment. Collectively, results demonstrated that the brief preference assessment identified stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for a simple operant response, identified preferred stimuli that were differentially effective as reinforcers compared to nonpreferred stimuli, was associated with fewer problem behaviors, and required less time to complete than a commonly used paired‐stimulus preference assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491 · Cited by 1,620
EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519 · Cited by 1,328
ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS
Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249 · Cited by 631
TRAINING MENTALLY RETARDED ADOLESCENTS TO BRUSH THEIR TEETH1
Horner, R. D., & Keilitz, I. (1975) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-301 · Cited by 261
TREATMENT OF SELF‐INJURY AND HAND MOUTHING FOLLOWING INCONCLUSIVE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES
Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & LeBlanc, L. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-331 · Cited by 237
Self-citationBehavioral counseling: Cases and techniques
Krumboltz, J. D., & Thoresen, C. E. (1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 225
ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS AND REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS
Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279 · Cited by 187
Self-citationAN ANALOGUE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT: THE ROLE OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE
Ringdahl, J. E., Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Roane, H. S. (1997) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-203 · Cited by 161
Self-citationREINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN
Egel, A. L. (1981) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345 · Cited by 161
A PRACTICAL STRATEGY FOR ONGOING REINFORCER ASSESSMENT
Mason, S. A., McGee, G. G., Farmer‐Dougan, V., & Risley, T. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Strain, P. S., Todd, A. W., & Reed, H. K. (2002) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1020593922901 · Cited by 614
EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT
Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353 · Cited by 405
Is preference a predictor of enrichment efficacy in Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis nigra)?
Mehrkam, L. R., & Dorey, N. R. (2014) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21151 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 605-620
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W1974802753
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605
- The paper
- Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.