Cited by 86Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

COMBINING STIMULUS FADING, REINFORCEMENT, AND EXTINCTION TO TREAT FOOD REFUSAL

Open access
Freeman, Kurt A., Piazza, Cathleen C.·1998·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

The food refusal of a 6‐year‐old girl with destructive behavior was treated using stimulus fading, reinforcement, and escape extinction. Intake increased and compliance with prompting procedures remained relatively stable despite the increased consumption requirement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-691

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensory-based food preferences in children and young people with autism have been shown to result in gagging, spitting, vomiting, self-injury, and aggression.

    “This has been shown to result in gagging, spitting, vomiting, self-injury, and aggression.47,[49][50][51]”
  • Various behavioural interventions, including backward chaining, stimulus fading procedures, repeated taste exposure, escape extinction, and positive reinforcement interventions, have been reported to improve intake and diminish the impact of limited intake for children and young people with autism displaying severe food selectivity, sensory dysfunction, and food and liquid refusal.

    “Various behavioural interventions, including backward chaining, stimulus fading procedures, repeated taste exposure, escape extinction, and positive reinforcement interventions have been reported to improve intake and diminish the impact of limited intake for children and young people with autism displaying severe food selectivity, sensory dysfunction, and food and liquid refusal.41,50,51,74,[77][”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, K. A., & Piazza, C. C.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Piazza, Cathleen C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
691-694
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2154972853
Cited by
86
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food refusal, stimulus fading, reinforcement, escape extinction, destructive behavior, prompting, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Child, Extinction, Psychological, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Patient Compliance, Reinforcement, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review