Cited by 17Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Treating Food and Liquid Refusal in an Adolescent With Asperger’s Disorder

Roth, Michael P., Williams, Keith E., Paul, Candace M.·2010·Clinical Case Studies

Abstract

Food refusal is a complicated condition that has both medical and social implications. In this study, a 16-year-old boy with Asperger’s disorder, dependent on gastrostromy tube feedings for 9 years, is treated with a behavioral intervention. The intervention consists of several components, including stimulus fading for both solids and liquids, a token economy for solids, and an escape prevention component for liquids. Before treatment, the participant consumes three different foods and water. After treatment, the participant is consuming 78 foods and 13 beverages. At the end of 14 days of treatment, all of the participant’s intakes are received orally, tube feedings are eliminated, and the patient has gained more than 1 pound on oral feedings. The intervention is generalized to both home and school settings, and maintenance of treatment gains is reported by parents 3 months after the end of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534650110373500

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most observable consequence of a severely restricted diet is low weight or significant weight loss, which in children tends to manifest as a persistent inability to meet expected growth or developmental expectations.

    “Arguably, the most observable consequence of a severely restricted diet is low weight or significant weight loss, which in children tends to manifest as a persistent inability to meet expected growth or developmental expectations.41,53,54,66,67”
  • Various behavioural interventions, including backward chaining, stimulus fading procedures, repeated taste exposure, escape extinction, and positive reinforcement interventions, have been reported to improve intake and diminish the impact of limited intake for children and young people with autism displaying severe food selectivity, sensory dysfunction, and food and liquid refusal.

    “Various behavioural interventions, including backward chaining, stimulus fading procedures, repeated taste exposure, escape extinction, and positive reinforcement interventions have been reported to improve intake and diminish the impact of limited intake for children and young people with autism displaying severe food selectivity, sensory dysfunction, and food and liquid refusal.41,50,51,74,[77][”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, M. P., Williams, K. E., & Paul, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Case Studies
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
260-272
ISSN
  • 1534-6501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3802
OpenAlex
W1986244011
Cited by
17
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Case Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
food refusal, Asperger syndrome, adolescents, behavioral interventions, stimulus fading, token economy, escape prevention, gastrostomy tube feeding, oral feeding, treatment generalization, maintenance therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review