Cited by 121Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

THE EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL SKILLS TRAINING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PICTURE EXCHANGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Open access
Rosales, Rocio, Stone, Karen, Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne·2009·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

The effectiveness of a behavioral skills training (BST) package to teach the implementation of the first three phases of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) was evaluated with 3 adults who had no history teaching any functional communication system. A multiple baseline design across participants was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training package, which consisted of a video, written and verbal instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback. Results showed significant improvements relative to baseline in a short amount of training time and that skills generalized to a learner with a severe developmental disability. Skills were maintained at 1 month follow‐up for 1 participant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-541

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practicing the skill is a critical feature for the success of BST and should be required of each trainee to produce effective performance.

    “However, practicing the skill is a critical feature for the success of BST and should be required of each trainee to produce effective performance (Nigro-Bruzzi & Sturmey, 2010;Rosales et al., 2009).”

    From Evidence-Based Staff Training: A Guide for Practitioners (2012) · cites this paper as Rosales et al., 2009

    The Procedure describes rehearsal for every trainee as part of a BST package, and Results and Discussion reports that all participants met the posttraining performance criterion. The study evaluated the package as a whole, however; it does not establish that practice alone is critical to success or must be required of every trainee. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Video models have been effectively incorporated into BST as the demonstration component for teaching staff various skills such as conducting discrete-trial instruction and use of picture communication systems.

    “Alternatively, video models have been effectively incorporated into BST as the demonstration component for teaching staff various skills such as conducting discrete-trial instruction (Catania et al., 2009;Sarakoff & Sturmey, 2004) and use of picture communication systems (Rosales et al., 2009).”

    From Evidence-Based Staff Training: A Guide for Practitioners (2012) · cites this paper as Rosales et al., 2009

    The Abstract reports improved PECS implementation after a BST package that included video. The Procedure says participants watched PECS videos, but identifies the trainer and confederate’s live demonstration as the modeling component repeated during BST. The study therefore supports incorporating video into effective PECS training, not specifically using video models as the BST demonstration component. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosales, R., Stone, K., & Rehfeldt, R. A.
Corresponding author
Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
541-549
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2160361412
Cited by
121
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
behavioral skills training, Picture Exchange Communication System, augmentative and alternative communication, functional communication, adults with developmental disabilities, video modeling, skill generalization, skill retention
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Teaching, Program Evaluation, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review