The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study
Open accessAbstract
This article presents the results of a three-year study of graduate and undergraduate students’ level of satisfaction with online instruction at one university. The study expands on earlier research into student satisfaction with e-learning. Researchers conducted a series of surveys over eight academic terms. Five hundred and fifty-three students participated in the study. Responses were consistent throughout, although there were some differences noted in the level of student satisfaction with their experience. There were no statistically significant differences in the level of satisfaction based on gender, age, or level of study. Overall, students rated their online instruction as moderately satisfactory, with hybrid or partially online courses rated as somewhat more satisfactory than fully online courses. “Convenience” was the most cited reason for satisfaction. “Lack of interaction” was the most cited reason for dissatisfaction. Preferences for hybrid courses surfaced in the responses to an open-ended question asking what made the experience with online or partially online courses satisfactory or unsatisfactory. This study’s findings support the literature to date and reinforce the significance of student satisfaction to student retention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x · Cited by 2,147
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 · Cited by 1,637
Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013) · Cited by 1,584
Swan, K. (2001) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791010220208 · Cited by 1,016
Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000) · Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1177/105256290002400104 · Cited by 742
Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems
Wang, Y.-S. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00028-4 · Cited by 718
No Significant Difference Phenomenon.
Layton, J. (1999) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 697
A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338 · Cited by 540
Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses
Bolliger, D. U. (2004) · International journal on e-learning · Cited by 536
Cited by
A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 · Cited by 616
Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review
Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007 · Cited by 399
Shorey, S., Kowitlawakul, Y., Devi, M. K., Chen, H.-C., Soong, S. K. A., & Ang, E. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011 · Cited by 112
A Preliminary Examination of Doctoral Student Retention Factors in Private Online Workspaces
(Cathy) Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/3958 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B.
- Venue
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
- Publisher
- Athabasca University Press
- Published
- 2014-10-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1564666649
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 68.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748
- The paper
- Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.