The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice
Abstract
This paper reviews econometric methods for dynamic panel data models, and presents examples that illustrate the use of these procedures. The focus is on panels where a large number of individuals or firms are observed for a small number of time periods, typical of applications with microeconomic data. The emphasis is on single equation models with autoregressive dynamics and explanatory variables that are not strictly exogenous, and hence on the Generalised Method of Moments estimators that are widely used in this context. Two examples using firm-level panels are discussed in detail: a simple autoregressive model for investment rates; and a basic production function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments
Staiger, D., & Stock, J. (1994) · doi:10.3386/t0151 · Cited by 5,302 · cited 1×
“See, for example, Bound, Jaeger and Baker (1995) and Staiger and Stock (1997) . 29 Blundell, Bond and Windmeijer (2000) suggest that this is also likely to be a concern in multivariate models when the individual series are highly persistent.”
Background
Cited by
How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata
Roodman, D. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900106 · Cited by 9,848
Estimation of Panel Vector Autoregression in Stata
Abrigo, M. R. M., & Love, I. (2016) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1601600314 · Cited by 1,019
Blunt Instruments: Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Identifying the Causes of Economic Growth
Bazzi, S., & Clemens, M. A. (2013) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.5.2.152 · Cited by 640
Samargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J., & Ghosh, S. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.010 · Cited by 647
The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence
Hasan, I., & Tucci, C. L. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.005 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Bond, S.
- Venue
- Working Paper Series
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
- Published
- 2002-04-03
- ISSN
- 1753-9196 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135699079
- Cited by
- 1,547
- References
- 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1920/wp.cem.2002.0902
- The paper
- Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice. Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.cem.2002.0902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
