How do pupils perceive educational robotics as a tool to improve their 21st century skills?
Open accessAbstract
In the past years, the use of educational robots has steadily increased, in particular due to the ongoing digitalization of modern societies and the new skills that professions require. It has been argued that educational robotics activities have the potential to promote the acquisition of such skills and may increase pupils’ interest in STEM disciplines. Despite these results, only few studies have examined the pupils’ perspective regarding the pedagogical value of educational robotics in formal education. Therefore, in this study with 91 pupils aged between 13 and 15 years, we aimed at investigating how pupils perceive educational robotics as a tool to improve their creativity, collaboration, computer science and computational thinking skills and to foster their interest in STEM disciplines. Over a period of one semester, the pupils worked with the robot Thymio II and evaluated their experience through a questionnaire. The results showed that boys and girls have different perceptions on which competences they could enhance: while boys affirmed more often than girls, that they could improve their computer science and computational thinking skills, the opposite was found for collaboration and creativity. Moreover, the results illustrated that educational robotics activities could increase the interest in coding, computer science and engineering, however, this was predominantly observed in boys.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Ardito G., Mosley P. & Scollins L. (2014), We, robot: Using robotics to promote collaborative and mathematics learning in a middle school classroom, Middle Grades Research Journal, 93 (3), 73-88.
- Chevalier M., Riedo F. & Mondada F. (2016), Pedagogical Uses of Thymio II: How Do Teachers Perceive Educational Robots in Formal Education?, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23 (2), 16-23.
- Erdogan I., Ciftci A., Yildirim B. & Topcu M.S. (2017), STEM Education Practices: Examination of the Argumentation Skills of Pre-service Science Teachers, Journal of Education and Practice, 25 (8), 164-173.
- Kaloti-Hallak F., Armoni M. & Ben-Ari M. (2015), Students' Attitudes and Motivation During Robotics Activities, Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, London, ACM Press.
- Naizer G., Hawthorne M. J. & Henley T. B. (2014), Narrowing the Gender Gap: Enduring Changes in Middle School Students' Attitude toward Math, Science and Technology, Journal of STEM Education, 15 (3), 29-34.
- Nugent G., Barker B., Grandgenett N. & Adamchuk V. (2010), The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming, IEEE Frontiers in education conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
- Pallant J. (2013), SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.), Berkshire, McGrawHill.
- Park I.-W. & Han J. (2016), Teachers' views on the use of robots and cloud services in education for sustainable development, Cluster Computing, 19 (2), 987-999.
- Theodoropoulos A., Antoniou A. & Lepouras G. (2017), Teacher and student views on educational robotics: The Pan-Hellenic competition case, Application and Theory of Computer Technology, 2 (4), 1-23.
- Welch A. G. (2010), Using the TOSRA to Assess High School Students' Attitudes toward Science after Competing in the FIRST Robotics Competition: An Exploratory Study, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6 (3), 187-197.
- Weinberg J.B., Pettibone J.C., Thomas S.L., Stephen M.L. & Stein C. (2007), The impact of robot projects on girls attitudes toward science and engineering, Workshop on Research in Robots for Education, Atlanta, USA.
- Wing J. (2006), Computational Thinking, Communications of the ACM, 49 (3), 33-35.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z · Cited by 223 · see citing works
“Among others, ER activities have been praised for the development of important twenty-first century skills such as creativity (Eguchi, 2014; Negrini & Giang, 2019; Romero, Lepage, & Lille, 2017) and collaboration (Denis & Hubert, 2001; Giang et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStudying interrelations of computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review (2011–2020)
Israel‐Fishelson, R., & Hershkovitz, A. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104353 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Using Robotics to Enhance Active Learning in Mathematics: A Multi-Scenario Study
López-Caudana, E. O., Soledad, M., Pérez, S. M., & Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8122163 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Msafiri, M. M., Kangwa, D., Lianyu, C., & Fute, A. Z. (2023) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22707 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Msafiri, M. M., Kangwa, D., Lianyu, C., & Fute, A. Z. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00524-0 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Chang, C.-C., & Chen, Y. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09841-9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Computational Thinking Development: Benefiting from Educational Robotics in STEM Teaching
Budiyanto, C. W., Fenyvesi, K., Lathifah, A., & Yuana, R. A. (2022) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.1997 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lin, C.-J., & Mubarok, H. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2308101 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Cano, S. P. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11030395 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
van Wassenaer, N., Tolboom, J., & van Beekum, O. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13020139 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Giang, C., Addimando, L., Botturi, L., Negrini, L., Giusti, A., & Piatti, A. (2023) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-023-00098-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationEducational robotics studies in Italian scientific journals: A systematic review
Bonaiuti, G., Campitiello, L., Tore, S. D., & Marras, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1005669 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ali, N., Santos, I. M., AlHakmani, R., Khurma, O. A., Khine, M. S., & Kassem, U. A. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13646 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Peng, Y., Wang, X., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Dong, Z., Wang, Y., Lyu, S., & Wang, W. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2557392 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The impact of twenty-first century skills on university students’ robotic achievements
Coşkun, T. K., & Filiz, O. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11850-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Education 4.0: Robotics Projects to Encourage 21st Century Skills
Silva, D. E. D. S., Sousa, A. D. O., de Oliveira, M. R., Sobrinho, M. C., Todt, E., & Valentim, N. (2021) · RENOTE · doi:10.22456/1679-1916.110285 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Teachers’ Reasons to Join a Community About Educational Robotics and STEAM: A Swiss Experience
Negrini, L., Mury, S. R., Moonnee, D., Rossetti, P., & Skweres, M. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77022-8_16 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationStudies on Robotic Coding Education in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Kapucu, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health · doi:10.55549/jeseh.1239093 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Educational Robotics in Online Distance Learning: An Experience from Primary School
Giang, C., & Negrini, L. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationAzoresbot: An Arduino Based Robot for Robocup Competitions
Cascalho, J., Mendes, A. B., Ramos, A., Pedro, F., Bonito, N., Almeida, D., Augusto, P., Leite, P., Funk, M. G., & Garcia, A. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_44 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
PEDAGOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS IN PRE SCHOOL TEACHING
Gümüş, M. M., Kayhan, O., Korkmaz, Ö., Altun, H., & Yılmaz, N. (2023) · International Online Journal of Primary Education · doi:10.55020/iojpe.1177237 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Exploring Destination Imagination Alumni Perceptions of 21st-Century Skills and Workforce Readiness
Kovalevsky, S. (2023) · IAFOR International Conference on Education, official conference proceedings · doi:10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2023.14 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Transformation of labor: Educational robotics coding in elementary schools for 21st century skills
Yüksel, A. O., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2024) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100890 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Aligning the Design of Educational Robotics Tools With Classroom Activities
Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Francesco Mondada, C. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7443-0.ch001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationGender Disparity in Computational Thinking Pedagogy and Assessment: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis
Liu, S., Dai, Y., Ng, O. L., & Cai, Z. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10095-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Demonstration of Roteco - the robotic teacher community:
Negrini, L., Mury, S. R., Skweres, M., & Kollegger, N. (2021) · FabLearn Europe / MakeEd - International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education · doi:10.1145/3466725.3466767 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationDesigning Tools and Activities for Educational Robotics in Online Learning
Negrini, L., Giang, C., & Bonnet, E. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7443-0.ch010 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationEducational robotics as a physical sciences teaching tool
Ramirez, O. J. V., Cruz, J. E., & Mamani, W. (2021) · Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO) · doi:10.1109/laclo54177.2021.00050 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Negrini, L., & Giang, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH)
- Venue
- Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society
- Publisher
- Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society
- Published
- 2019-06-16
- OpenAlex
- W2955813716
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Locations
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Società Italiana di e-Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- educational robotics, student perceptions, 21st century skills, computational thinking, creativity, collaboration, STEM interest, gender differences, computer science education, high school students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
