Cited by 26Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Intervención grupal para reducir la violencia de género entre consumidoras de drogas. Resultados de un estudio piloto en un centro comunitario de tratamiento de adicciones

Open access
Tirado-Muñoz, Judit, Gilchrist, Gail, Lligoña, Eva, Gilbert, Louisa, Torrens, Marta·2015·Adicciones

Abstract

Antecedentes: Las mujeres usuarias de drogas son víctimas de violencia de género en mayor proporción que las mujeres en población general; sin embargo, pocas intervenciones se han desarrollado para reducir la violencia de género entre mujeres usuarias de drogas. Métodos: Una versión adaptada de la intervención “Women’s Wellness Treatment” para reducir violencia de género y síntomas depresivos, ha sido evaluada mediante un ensayo clínico piloto en un centro de tratamiento ambulatorio en Barcelona, España. Catorce mujeres que recibían tratamiento ambulatorio para un trastorno por consumo de sustancias y que declararon ser víctimas de violencia en el mes anterior fueron incluidas en el ensayo clínico. Las participantes fueron asignados al azar para recibir 10 sesiones grupales de terapia cognitivo-conductual (IPaViT-CBT) o tratamiento habitual. La frecuencia de violencia, síntomas depresivos, consumo de sustancias, calidad de vida y estado de salud fueron evaluados al inicio del estudio y 1, 3 y 12 meses después de la intervención. Se realizó análisis por intención de tratar. Resultados: Se encontraron efectos moderados de la intervención en la reducción de maltrato psicológico, aumento de la asertividad y la reducción de la agresividad en la relación de pareja, y reducción en la frecuencia de consumo de alcohol hasta 3 meses después de la intervención. La intervención no redujo significativamente la probabilidad de ser víctima de cualquier tipo de violencia de género, los síntomas depresivos, calidad de vida o el estado de salud auto-referido, hasta 12 meses después de la intervención. Conclusiones: Los resultados de este estudio piloto indican que es factible realizar una intervención de 10 sesiones grupales de TCC entre las víctimas de violencia de género que reciben tratamiento por uso de sustancias en un centro comunitario de tratamiento de adicciones. Se requiere un ensayo clínico más robusto para replicar estos resultados.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20882/adicciones.703

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Tirado-Muñoz et al. (2015) study, the standardized mean difference for emotional abuse scores was -1.20 (CI: -4.94, 2.54), indicating an unclear change compared to controls.

    “Tirado-Muñoz et al. (Adicciones, 27(3), 168-178, 2015) 2015; SMD = -1.20 CI: -4.94, 2.54”

    From Systematic review on the treatment of emotional abuse victimization in women by an intimate partner (2025) · cites this paper as Tirado-Muñoz et al. (Adicciones, 27(3), 168-178, 2015)

    Table 2 reports 12-month emotional/verbal abuse means of 11.60 for the intervention group and 12.80 for controls, a raw difference of -1.20. The PMWI results section says the between-group difference was not statistically significant. The paper does not report -1.20 as a standardized mean difference or give the stated confidence interval. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]14. Fearday, F., Clark, C. y Edington, M. (Eds.) (2001). Triad Women's Project Group Facilitator Manual and Workbook. Tampa, FL: Louis de la Porte Florida Mental Health Ins- titute, University of South Florida.
  2. [32]32. Miller, B. A., Downs, W. R. y Testa, M. (1993). Interrela- tionships between victimization experiences and wo- men's alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. Supple- ment, 11, 109-117.
  3. [46]46. Torrens, M., Gilchrist, G. y Domingo-Salvany, A. (2011). Psychiatric comorbidity in illicit drug users: substan- ce-induced versus independent disorders. Drug and Al- cohol Dependence, 113, 147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalc- dep.2010.07.013 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tirado-Muñoz, J., Gilchrist, G., Lligoña, E., Gilbert, L., & Torrens, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Parc de Salut (ES)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Adicciones
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
168-178
ISSN
0214-4840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2180993715
Cited by
26
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Adicciones (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, gender-based violence, addiction treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, group intervention, depressive symptoms, assertiveness, alcohol consumption, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Community Mental Health Centers, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Spain, Spouse Abuse, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review