PreprintCited by 17Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Generative Models: A Review of GANs and Diffusion Models in Medical Imaging

Open access
Alam, Md Minul, Latifi, Shahram·2025·Algorithms

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive, non-curable neurodegenerative disorder that poses persistent challenges for early diagnosis due to its gradual onset and the difficulty in distinguishing pathological changes from normal aging. Neuroimaging, particularly MRI and PET, plays a key role in detection; however, limitations in data availability and the complexity of early structural biomarkers constrain traditional diagnostic approaches. This review investigates the use of generative models specifically Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Diffusion Models as emerging tools to address these challenges. These models are capable of generating high-fidelity synthetic brain images, augmenting datasets, and enhancing machine learning performance in classification tasks. The review synthesizes findings across multiple studies, revealing that GAN-based models achieved diagnostic accuracies up to 99.70%, with image quality metrics such as SSIM reaching 0.943 and PSNR up to 33.35 dB. Diffusion Models, though relatively new, demonstrated strong performance with up to 92.3% accuracy and FID scores as low as 11.43. Integrating generative models with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and multimodal inputs further improved diagnostic reliability. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including high computational demands, limited interpretability, and ethical concerns regarding synthetic data. This review offers a comprehensive perspective to inform future AI-driven research in early AD detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202506.1854.v1

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few reviewed studies considered how digital literacy, age, or socioeconomic status may hinder access and engagement with mHealth interventions.

    “Few studies considered how digital literacy, age, or socioeconomic status may hinder access and engagement with mHealth interventions [42,43].”

    From Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    Section 4.2 reviews generative models for Alzheimer’s diagnosis using neuroimaging, while the Discussion and Conclusion addresses limitations such as generalizability and clinical validation. Searches for digital literacy, socioeconomic barriers, and mHealth access or engagement found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. F. Khandoker, J. Uddin, T. Fariha, and S. Sultana Shumi, "Importance of Psychological Well-being after disasters in Bangladesh: A Narrative Review," International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 10, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.26438/ijsrms/v10i10.16. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alam, M. M., & Latifi, S.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Latifi, Shahram
Venue
Algorithms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-24
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
434-434
ISSN
1999-4893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412451508
Cited by
17
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Algorithms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, early diagnosis, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, medical image augmentation, magnetic resonance imaging, PET, multimodal neuroimaging, convolutional neural networks, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review