Cited by 30Seedling growth and survival studiesGeology and Environmental Impact StudiesForest ecology and management

SELECTING TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTES FOR FORESTRY MINE SOILS

Open access
Skousen, Jeff, Zipper, Carl, Burger, Jim, Angel, Patrick, Barton, Christopher·2011·Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation

Abstract

The Forestry Reclamation Approach is a five-step system for reclaiming mined lands to forests.Step 1 of the FRA involves creating a suitable rooting medium for good tree growth using topsoil, weathered sandstone and/or the best available material.Several types of overburden types can be selected to place on the surface as growth media.These spoil types include weathered brown sandstone and unweathered rock materials including sandstones, siltstones, shales, and mixtures of these materials.When sufficient topsoil is not salvageable, reclamation scientists often recommend that, when available, weathered sandstone should be considered as the 'best available' topsoil substitute material.Here, we review the scientific evidence that supports such recommendations.Several studies have shown that tree survival was not significantly different among spoil types.Weathered brown sandstone, unweathered gray sandstone, siltstone and shale materials all produced good tree survival (>70%) when compaction and competitive ground covers were reduced.However, growth for most trees (as measured by height, diameter, and volume) was usually significantly greater in weathered brown materials than in unweathered sandstones, siltstones, shales, and mixed spoils.At one site in West Virginia five years after planting, a 10-fold difference in tree volume was found between these two spoil types.Similar results have been found with other studies across Appalachian surface mines.Based on the results of studies summarized herein, the use of weathered brown sandstone is generally recommended, along with topsoil materials when available, to be placed on the surface on sites where hardwood tree species are being planted for forestry post-mining land uses.Weathered brown sandstone spoil materials have a pH, soluble salt content, fine earth content well suited for trees, and sufficient nutrient supplying and water holding capacity that results in superior tree growth compared to other spoil types.The brown sandstone material more closely resembles the native forest soil than the unweathered gray materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21000/jasmr11010591

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brown mine soil is the preferred topsoil substitute in reforestation projects when insufficient quantities of native soil are salvaged.

    “Brown mine soil is the preferred topsoil substitute in reforestation projects when insu cient quantities of native soil are salvaged [20]”

    From Early Tree Growth in Reclaimed Mine Soils in Appalachia USA (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. R.I. Barnhisel (ed.) ASMR, Lexington, KY.
  2. Angel, P.N., C.D. Barton, R.C. Warner, C. Agouridis, T. Taylor, and S.L. Hall. 2008. Tree growth and natural regeneration, and hydrologic characteristics of three loose-graded surface mine spoil types in Kentucky. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2008 pp 1-40.
  3. Ashby, W.C. 2006. Reflections of a botanist on reclamation to trees. Reclamation Matters, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Fall 2006. Am. Soc. of Mining and Reclamation, Lexington, KY.
  4. Gorman, J., J. Skousen, J. Sencindiver, and P. Ziemkiewicz. 2001. Forest productivity and minesoil development under a white pine plantation versus natural vegetation after 30 years. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2001 pp. 103-111.
  5. Isabell M. 2001. Special handling and unique mining practices at Fola Coal Company. In: Skousen J (ed). Proceedings, 22nd West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown WV.
  6. In R.I. Barnhisel et al. (ed.) Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. 2 nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 41. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  7. Tryon, E.H. 1952. Forest cover for spoil banks. West Virginia Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station Bulletin 357. West Virginia University, Morgantown.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skousen, J., Zipper, C., Burger, J., Angel, P., & Barton, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
Published
2011-06-30
Volume
2011
Issue
1
Pages
591-609
ISSN
2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2182701811
Cited by
30
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
mine reclamation, tree survival, tree growth, siltstone, shale, sandstone, rooting medium, soil pH, soluble salts, water holding capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review