Cited by 21Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis for colonoscopy: where do we stand now?

Open access
Kudo, Shin-Ei, Mori, Yuichi, Abdel-aal, Usama M., Misawa, Masashi, Itoh, Hayato, Oda, Masahiro, Mori, Kensaku·2021·Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for colonoscopy with use of artificial intelligence (AI) is catching increased attention of endoscopists. CAD allows automated detection and pathological prediction, namely optical biopsy, of colorectal polyps during real-time endoscopy, which help endoscopists avoid missing and/or misdiagnosing colorectal lesions. With the increased number of publications in this field and emergence of the AI medical device that have already secured regulatory approval, CAD in colonoscopy is now being implemented into clinical practice. On the other side, drawbacks and weak points of CAD in colonoscopy have not been thoroughly discussed. In this review, we provide an overview of CAD for optical biopsy of colorectal lesions with a particular focus on its clinical applications and limitations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/tgh.2019.12.14

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on CADx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of AI against the accuracy of physicians or against criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting.

    “Previous studies on cadx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of ai against the accuracy of physicians19,20,27–30, or against the criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting31–34.”

    From Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, et al. A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Mag 2006;27:12-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kudo, S.-E., Mori, Y., Abdel-aal, U. M., Misawa, M., Itoh, H., Oda, M., & Mori, K.
Affiliations
  • SHOWA Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kudo, Shin-Ei
Venue
Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Published
2021-10
Volume
6
Pages
64-64
ISSN
2415-1289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025145198
Cited by
21
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
computer-aided diagnosis, colonoscopy, artificial intelligence, optical biopsy, colorectal polyps, colorectal lesions, AI medical devices, regulatory approval, clinical implementation, AI limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review