Cited by 48Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Nutrition and Health

Efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Open access
Huang, Rao, Xing, Hong-Yi, Liu, Hong-Juan, Chen, Ze-Fu, Tang, Bi-Bo·2021·Translational Pediatrics

Abstract

Background: If acute diarrhea in children is not treated promptly and effectively, it can lead to severe dehydration and serious sequelae.Due to the imbalance of intestinal bacteria in children with acute diarrhea, the supplementation with probiotics is important, which can improve the intestinal microenvironment, promote immunity, and enhance resistance.This meta-analysis provides further evidence and discussion of the therapeutic effect of probiotics on acute diarrhea in children.Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched by rapid matching.The input keywords were as follows: (probiotics/synbiotics) and (child/children) and (acute diarrhea/acute gastroenteritis).Articles reporting on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics in treating acute diarrhea in children were retrieved.The studies were published from 2010 to 2020.After screening and quality evaluation, Stata 16.0 software was used for the analysis.Results: Twelve articles with 744 patients were included in the study, and the overall quality of the articles was excellent.Meta-analysis showed that the duration of diarrhea in the probiotics group was shorter than that in the control group [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.74, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.37, Z=-3.935,P=0.000], the 2-day treatment efficacy for diarrhea in the probiotics group was greater than that in the control group [odds ratio (OR) =2.12, 95% CI: 1.47-3.05,Z=3.998, P=0.000], and the length of hospital stay in the probiotics group was shorter than that of the control group (SMD =-0.60, 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.47, Z=-8.781,P=0.000).In the subgroup analysis, combined probiotics shortened the duration of diarrhea compared with single probiotic use, and Lactobacillus reuteri and Saccharomyces boulardii had a better therapeutic effect than Lactobacillus rhamnosus or Lactobacillus acidophilus.Discussion: In the treatment of acute diarrhea in children, the addition of probiotics can shorten the duration of diarrhea, increase treatment efficacy after 2 days of treatment, and shorten the length of hospital stay.However, because of possible publication bias in the current study, further high-quality RCT studies in clinical settings are needed to verify the current results and continue the exploration of this topic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/tp-21-511

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is substantial evidence in the literature of the beneficial effects of probiotics on diarrhea, especially the prevention of traveler's diarrhea and the treatment of acute diarrhea in children.

    “There is substantial evidence in the literature of the beneficial effects of probiotics on diarrhea, especially the prevention of traveler’s diarrhea [105,106] and the treatment of acute diarrhea in children [107].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, R., Xing, H.-Y., Liu, H.-J., Chen, Z.-F., & Tang, B.-B.
Affiliations
  • Hainan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN)
  • Hainan General Hospital (CN)
Venue
Translational Pediatrics
Published
2021-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
3248-3260
ISSN
  • 2224-4336 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-4344
OpenAlex
W4206235229
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Translational Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, acute diarrhea, children, acute gastroenteritis, synbiotics, Lactobacillus reuteri, Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, diarrhea duration, length of hospital stay, gut microbiota, dehydration prevention, treatment efficacy comparison, publication bias, subgroup analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review