Cited by 33Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in Infants and Children With Acute Diarrhea

Open access
Mourey, Florian, Sureja, Varun, Kheni, Dharmeshkumar, Shah, Parthiv, Parikh, Devang, Upadhyay, Unmesh, Satia, Milan, Shah, Dhara +2 more·2020·Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

Aim: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces cerevisiae variant boulardii CNCM I-3799 ( S . boulardii CNCM I-3799) in the management of acute diarrhea in children. Methods: A total of 100 infants and children 3–36 months of age with acute diarrhea received medical care according to the World Health Organization guidelines on the management of acute diarrhea in children and were randomly allocated to the probiotic group ( S. boulardii CNCM I-3799 at a daily dose of 5 billion CFU twice daily) or to the placebo group. Infants and children were treated for 5 days and an extended follow-up was planned 1 and 2 months after the end of the treatment period. Primary endpoint was the time of recovery from diarrhea defined as the duration of diarrhea. Other parameters, such as frequency and consistency of stools, associated with the severity of diarrhea episodes were defined as secondary endpoints. Results: The administration of S. boulardii CNCM I-3799 was associated with beneficial effects on duration and severity of diarrhea. The time of recovery from diarrhea was significantly shorter in the probiotic group compared with the placebo group (65.8 ± 12 hours vs. 95.3 ± 17.6 hours, P = 0.0001). Faster remission in the probiotic group was also demonstrated by a shorter time before the first episode of semisolid stool [−23.5 hours, diff (95% CI): −7.99 (−31.49 to −15.51), P = 0.0001] and the faster normalization of stool consistency. S. boulardii CNCM I-3799 was well tolerated. Conclusion: S. boulardii CNCM I-3799 supplementation in children with acute diarrhea was shown effective in reducing the duration and severity of diarrhea in infants and children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/inf.0000000000002849

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNCM I-3799 (Ecoviva, Sporit GG) shortened pediatric acute diarrhea duration (65.8 vs. 95.3 hours, p = 0.0001) without adverse events.

    “Similarly, CNCM I-3799 (Ecoviva, Sporit GG) shortened pediatric acute diarrhea duration (65.8 vs. 95.3 hours, p = 0.0001) without adverse events, highlighting its resilience and safety.45”

    From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Primary Endpoint and Secondary Endpoints; page unavailable) support the reported recovery times and P value for children receiving S. boulardii CNCM I-3799 versus placebo. But the Results (Safety Evaluation; page unavailable) report adverse events in 14.3% of probiotic recipients, although none were judged possibly linked to the product. The Methods (Interventions; page unavailable) name the test product as LesunBerry Sundyota Numandis, not Ecoviva or Sporit GG. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mourey, F., Sureja, V., Kheni, D., Shah, P., Parikh, D., Upadhyay, U., Satia, M., Shah, D., Troise, C., & Decherf, A.
Affiliations
  • Lesaffre (France) (FR)
  • Sundyota Numandis Probioceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
  • Hitarth Children Hospital
  • Bakeri Medical Research Centre
  • Iqra Hospital
  • Ethicare Clinical Trial Services, Ahmedabad, India.
Corresponding author
  • Mourey, Florian
  • Troise, Charlotte
  • Decherf, Amélie
Venue
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2020-08-14
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
e347-e351
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049478906
Cited by
33
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Saccharomyces boulardii, probiotics, acute diarrhea, infants, children, diarrhea duration, stool consistency, probiotic safety, pediatric diarrhea treatment
MeSH terms
Saccharomyces boulardii, Acute Disease, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Male, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review