Cited by 204Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Evaluation of a Voluntary Menu-Labeling Program in Full-Service Restaurants

Open access
Pulos, Elizabeth, Leng, Kirsten·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We assessed whether labeling restaurant menus with information on the nutrient content of menu items would cause customers to alter their ordering patterns. Methods. Six full-service restaurants in Pierce County, Washington, added nutrition information to their menus, and they provided data on entrée sales for 30 days before and 30 days after the information was added. We assessed the prelabeling versus postlabeling difference in nutrient content of entrées sold, and we surveyed restaurant patrons about whether they noticed the nutrition information and used it in their ordering. Results. The average postlabeling entrée sold contained about 15 fewer calories, 1.5 fewer grams of fat, and 45 fewer milligrams of sodium than did the average entrée sold before labeling. Seventy-one percent of patrons reported noticing the nutrition information; 20.4% reported ordering an entrée lower in calories as a result, and 16.5% reported ordering an entrée lower in fat as a result. Conclusions. The concentration of calorie reduction among 20.4% of patrons means that each calorie-reducing patron ordered about 75 fewer calories than they did before labeling. Thus, providing nutrition information on restaurant menus may encourage a subset of restaurant patrons to significantly alter their food choices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.174839

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A comparison of meals purchased at full-service restaurants in Washington state found that adding caloric and nutrient information to menus was associated with selection of entrees that were lower in calories, fat, and sodium during the next month.

    “Similarly, a comparison of meals purchased at full-service restaurants in Washington state found that adding caloric and nutrient information to menus was associated with selection of entrees that were lower in calories, fat, and sodium during the next month.118”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pulos, E., & Leng, K.
Affiliations
Tacoma Pierce County Health Department (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-06
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
1035-1039
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2167393090
Cited by
204
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 18
FWCI
20.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
menu labeling, nutrition information, full-service restaurants, calorie reduction, food choice, sodium intake, dietary fat intake, restaurant customers
MeSH terms
Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Humans, Nutritive Value, Restaurants, Washington, Program Evaluation, Voluntary Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review