Cited by 178Health disparities and outcomesMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The unique impact of abolition of Jim Crow laws on reducing inequities in infant death rates and implications for choice of comparison groups in analyzing societal determinants of health

Open access
Krieger, Nancy, Chen, Jarvis T., Coull, Brent, Waterman, Pamela D., Beckfield, Jason·2013·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We explored associations between the abolition of Jim Crow laws (i.e., state laws legalizing racial discrimination overturned by the 1964 US Civil Rights Act) and birth cohort trends in infant death rates. METHODS: We analyzed 1959 to 2006 US Black and White infant death rates within and across sets of states (polities) with and without Jim Crow laws. RESULTS: Between 1965 and 1969, a unique convergence of Black infant death rates occurred across polities; in 1960 to 1964, the Black infant death rate was 1.19 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18, 1.20) in the Jim Crow polity than in the non-Jim Crow polity, whereas in 1970 to 1974 the rate ratio shrank to and remained at approximately 1 (with the 95% CI including 1) until 2000, when it rose to 1.10 (95% CI = 1.08, 1.12). No such convergence occurred for Black-White differences in infant death rates or for White infants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that abolition of Jim Crow laws affected US Black infant death rates and that valid analysis of societal determinants of health requires appropriate comparison groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2013.301350

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [39]39. US Census Bureau. Median family income by county: 1959, 1969, 1979, and 1989. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/county/county2.html. Accessed July 24, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Coull, B., Waterman, P. D., & Beckfield, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-12
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
2234-2244
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2073537294
Cited by
178
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R21CA168470)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
Jim Crow laws, infant mortality, racial disparities, Black infants, Civil Rights Act of 1964, comparison groups, racial discrimination, birth cohort trends
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Civil Rights, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, United States, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Censuses, Supreme Court Decisions, White People, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review