Cited by 546Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Racial/Ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976-89.

Open access
Bachman, J G, Wallace, J M, O'Malley, P M, Johnston, L D, Kurth, C L, Neighbors, H W·1991·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper reports racial/ethnic differences in the use of licit and illicit drugs by high school seniors in the United States. METHODS: The study uses questionnaire data from annual, nationally representative surveys of seniors from 1976 through 1989. Combined sample sizes were 57,620 for 1976-79; 75,772 for 1980-84; and 73,527 for 1985-89. RESULTS: Native American had the highest prevalence rates for cigarettes, alcohol, and most illicit drugs; White students had the next highest rates for most drugs. Asian Americans had the lowest prevalence rates, and Black students had levels nearly as low except for marijuana. Prevalence rates for the Hispanic groups were mostly in the intermediate ranges except for relatively high cocaine use among the males. Trend patterns for most forms of drug use were similar across subgroups, although cigarette use declined more sharply for Black than White seniors, resulting in greater Black-White differences in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: This study, other school-based studies, and general population surveys all show relatively low levels of drug use by most non-White youth, especially Black Americans and Asian Americans. Multivariate analyses indicate that such subgroup differences in high school seniors' drug use are not primarily attributable to family composition, parents' education, region, or urban-rural distinctions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.81.3.372

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachman, J. G., Wallace, J. M., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Kurth, C. L., & Neighbors, H. W.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1991-03
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
372-377
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2026687066
Cited by
545
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA01411, R01DA001411)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
racial and ethnic differences, adolescent drug use, high school seniors, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, cannabis use, cocaine use, Asian Americans, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, drug use trends, family structure, parental education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Asia, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Mexico, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Smoking, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review