Cited by 426Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys.

Open access
Sobell, L C, Cunningham, J A, Sobell, M B·1996·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment, including whether such recoveries involved abstinence or moderate drinking. METHODS. Data from two surveys of randomly selected adults in the general population were analyzed. Random-digit dialing was used to conduct telephone interviews with 11,634 and 1034 respondents. Respondents 20 years of age or older were categorized on the basis of drinking status and history. RESULTS. Both surveys found that most individuals (77.5% and 77.7%) who had recovered from an alcohol problem for 1 year or more did so without help or treatment. A sizable percentage (38% and 63%) also reported drinking moderately after resolving their problem. CONCLUSIONS. These two surveys are among the first to report prevalence rates for recovery from alcohol problems for treated and untreated individuals and for moderation and abstinence outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.86.7.966

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base ofTreatmentforAlcohol Problems. Washing- ton, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
  2. Fillmore KM, Hartka E, Johnstone BM, Speiglman R, Temple MT. Spontaneous Remission of Alcohol Problems: A Critical Review. Washington, DC; Institute of Medi- cine; 1988.
  3. Fillmore KM. Alcohol Use Across the Life Course: A Critical Review of 70 Years of Intemational Longitudinal Research. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addiction Re- search Foundation; 1988.
  4. Moore MH, Gerstein DR. Alcohol and Public Policy: Beyond the Shadow ofProhibi- tion. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1981.
  5. Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Pierce JP, et al. Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. JAA'4. 1990;263:2760-2765.
  6. Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Kozlowski LT. Dual recoveries from alcohol and smoking prob- lems. In: Alcohol and Tobacco: Basic Science to Policy. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcohol- ism; 1995:207.
  7. Pattison EM, Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Emerging Concepts ofAlcohol Dependence. New York, NY: Springer; 1977.
  8. Armor DJ, MeshkoffJE. Remission among treated and untreated alcoholics. In: Mello NK, ed. Advances in Substance Abuse: Behavioral and Biological Research. Green- wich, Conn: JAI Press; 1983; 3.
  9. Vaillant GE. The Natural History ofAlcohol- ism: Causes, Patterns, and Paths to Recovery. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1983.
  10. Anthony JC, Warner LA, Kessler RC. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the National Comorbidity Survey. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994;2:244-268.
  11. Wessinger C, Wodarski JS. Accuracy of national surveys of drug use: a comparison with local studies. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 1994;39:62-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobell, L. C., Cunningham, J. A., & Sobell, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1996-07
Volume
86
Issue
7
Pages
966-972
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2051317063
Cited by
426
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa008593-06)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA08593)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
alcohol problems, prevalence, abstinence, moderate drinking, alcohol treatment, drinking status, alcohol use history
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Canada, Convalescence, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Self Care, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review