Cited by 10Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Comparing the efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention versus relapse prevention for alcohol use disorder: A randomized control trial

Open access
Skrzynski, Carillon J., Karoly, Hollis, Ellingson, Jarrod, Hangerty, Sarah, Bryan, Angela D., Hutchison, Kent E.·2023·Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) with relapse prevention (RP) on reducing alcohol consumption. Secondary, exploratory aims assessed moderation of treatment effects by sex and cannabis use. METHOD: A total of 182 individuals (48.4% female; 21-60 years old) who reported drinking more than 14/21 drinks/week (for women and men, respectively) in the past 3 months but who wished to quit/reduce their drinking were recruited from Denver and Boulder, Colorado. Individuals were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of individual-based MBRP or RP treatment. Participants completed substance use assessments at baseline, halfway through and at the end of treatment, and 20 and 32 weeks after treatment. Primary outcomes were Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-consumption questions (AUDIT-C) scores, heavy drinking days (HDD), and drinks per drinking day (DDD). RESULTS: < .005, respectively). High cannabis use frequency was associated with continued posttreatment decreases in HDD/DDD for MBRP participants but increased HDD for RP participants. At low cannabis use frequency levels, HDD/DDD remained stable after treatment across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Drinking decreases were comparable across treatments, but HDD improvements diminished for RP participants after treatment. In addition, cannabis use moderated treatment efficacy for HDD/DDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsad.21-00392

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The retention rate of the MBRP group was slightly lower than the TAU group but comparable to, or even better than, some previous MBRP studies.

    “Although the retention rate of the MBRP group was slightly lower than the TAU group, it was comparable to, or even better than, some of the previous MBRP studies [17, 49, 52, 53].”

    From The feasibility of mindfulness‐based relapse prevention for adults with substance use disorders (illicit drugs) in a Chinese population: A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Design section describes an MBRP-versus-RP trial, not an MBRP-versus-TAU trial. The Data analysis section mentions dropout, but the passages found do not give retention rates or compare them with earlier MBRP studies (searched: retention, attrition, dropout, and treatment completion). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MBRP average attendance in this study (4.59 sessions) was comparable to other studies (4.2-6.45 sessions).

    “MBRP average attendance in this study (4.59 sessions) was comparable to other studies (4.2–6.45 sessions) [17, 52, 53].”

    From The feasibility of mindfulness‐based relapse prevention for adults with substance use disorders (illicit drugs) in a Chinese population: A pilot randomized controlled trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The cited paper’s Study procedures describe an eight-session MBRP program, and its Substance use section says missed sessions were monitored. Neither passage reports mean attendance. Searches for 4.59, 6.45, and average sessions attended found no attendance figure to verify the comparison; the citing study’s own 4.59-session figure is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. May, C., & Nielsen, A. S. (2019). Barriers to treatment for alcohol depen- dence. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 8, 1-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skrzynski, C. J., Karoly, H., Ellingson, J., Hangerty, S., Bryan, A. D., & Hutchison, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
560-569
ISSN
  • 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4114
OpenAlex
W4318777305
Cited by
9
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA024632, K23AA028238)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness-based relapse prevention, relapse prevention, alcoholism, alcohol consumption reduction, heavy drinking, cannabis use, treatment moderators, sex differences, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Substance-Related Disorders, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review