Cited by 1,056Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Evidence-Based Public Health: Moving Beyond Randomized Trials

Open access
Victora, Cesar G., Habicht, Jean-Pierre, Bryce, Jennifer·2004·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evaluating the efficacy of clinical interventions, where the causal chain between the agent and the outcome is relatively short and simple and where results may be safely extrapolated to other settings. However, causal chains in public health interventions are complex, making RCT results subject to effect modification in different populations. Both the internal and external validity of RCT findings can be greatly enhanced by observational studies using adequacy or plausibility designs. For evaluating large-scale interventions, studies with plausibility designs are often the only feasible option and may provide valid evidence of impact. There is an urgent need to develop evaluation standards and protocols for use in circumstances where RCTs are not appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.94.3.400

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victora, C. G., Habicht, J.-P., & Bryce, J.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2004-03
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
400-405
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1984963575
Cited by
1,056
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 42
FWCI
49.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
evidence-based public health, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, causal inference, effect modification, generalizability, internal validity, large-scale interventions, evaluation standards, public health intervention evaluation
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Epidemiologic Research Design, Public Health Practice, Causality, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review