Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction

Griffin, Justin W., Hogan, MaCalus V., Chhabra, A. Bobby, Deal, D. Nicole·2013·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Abstract

When possible, direct repair remains the current standard of care for the repair of peripheral nerve lacerations. In large nerve gaps, in which direct repair is not possible, grafting remains the most viable option. Nerve scaffolds include autologous conduits, artificial nonbioabsorbable conduits, and bioabsorbable conduits and are options for repair of digital nerve gaps that are <3 cm in length. Experimental studies suggest that the use of allografts may be an option for repairing larger sensory nerve gaps without associated donor-site morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/jbjs.l.00704

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Griffin, J. W., Hogan, M. V., Chhabra, A. B., & Deal, D. N.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
2013-12
Volume
95
Issue
23
Pages
2144-2151
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161042757
Cited by
310
References
3
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/jbjs.l.00704
The paper
Griffin, J. W., Hogan, M. V., Chhabra, A. B., & Deal, D. N. (2013). Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.l.00704

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.