Cited by 701Protist diversity and phylogenyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans

Open access
Knoll, A.H, Javaux, E.J, Hewitt, D, Cohen, P·2006·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The geological record of protists begins well before the Ediacaran and Cambrian diversification of animals, but the antiquity of that history, its reliability as a chronicle of evolution and the causal inferences that can be drawn from it remain subjects of debate. Well-preserved protists are known from a relatively small number of Proterozoic formations, but taphonomic considerations suggest that they capture at least broad aspects of early eukaryotic evolution. A modest diversity of problematic, possibly stem group protists occurs in ca 1800-1300 Myr old rocks. 1300-720 Myr fossils document the divergence of major eukaryotic clades, but only with the Ediacaran-Cambrian radiation of animals did diversity increase within most clades with fossilizable members. While taxonomic placement of many Proterozoic eukaryotes may be arguable, the presence of characters used for that placement is not. Focus on character evolution permits inferences about the innovations in cell biology and development that underpin the taxonomic and morphological diversification of eukaryotic organisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2006.1843

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The oldest known potential eukaryotic microfossils are 1.87 Ga impressions of filaments similar to coiled green algae.

    “The oldest known potential eukaryotic microfossils are the 1.87 Ga impressions of filaments similar to coiled green algae (Knoll et al., 2006).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Knoll et al., 2006

    The palaeontological estimates section (p. 3) describes coiled Grypania fossils as likely eukaryotic and reports Canadian specimens from about 1850 Myr ago. It calls them macroscopic fossils, not microfossils, does not date them to 1.87 Ga, and says their phylogenetic relationships are poorly constrained rather than comparing them to green algae. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Marine life diversified extensively during the Neoproterozoic, and a wide range of biological groups existed by the start of the Ediacaran Period, including multiple microscopic prokaryotes and eukaryotes, acritarchs, simple macroscopic discoidal specimens, and putative metazoans.

    “Marine life diversified extensively during the Neoproterozoic, and a wide range of biological groups existed by the start of the Ediacaran Period.These included multiple microscopic prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Schopf and Barghorn, 1969;Porter and Knoll, 2000;Knoll et al., 2006;Butterfield, 2009a;Bosak et al., 2011bBosak et al., , 2012;;Cohen et al., 2011), acritarchs (e.g.Grey et al., 2011), a”

    From Remarkable insights into the paleoecology of the Avalonian Ediacaran macrobiota (2015) · cites this paper as Knoll et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Burzin, M. B., Gnilovskaya, M. B., Sokolov, B. C. & Fedonkin, M. A. 1997 Atlas of fossils in the Vendian of the Russian platform. Appendix 1. In Essays on the advent of the vendian system (ed. B. S. Sokolov), pp. 99-147. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press.
  2. Jankauskas, T. V. 1989 Mikrofossilii dokembriya SSSR (Precambrian microfossils of the USSR). Leningrad: Nauka pp. 1-90.
  3. Knoll, A. H. 1996 Archean and Proterozoic paleontology. In Palynology: principles and applications , vol. 1 (ed. J. Jansonius & D. C. McGregor), pp. 51-80. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.
  4. Nagovitsin, K. E. 2001 Mikrofossilii i stratigrafiya verchnego Rifeya Yugo-Zapadnoi chasti Siberskoi Platformi. Ph.D. Thesis, RAS Siberian Branch, Institute of Geology, p. 222.
  5. Schopf, J. W. 1992 Patterns of Proterozoic microfossil diversity: an initial, tentative analysis. In The Proterozoic biosphere: a multidisciplinary study (ed. J. W. Schopf & C. Klein), pp. 529-552. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Strother, P. K. 1996 Acritarchs. In Palynology: principles and applications , vol. 1 (ed. J. Jansonius & D. C. McGregor), pp. 81-106. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.
  7. Xiao, S., Knoll, A. H., Kaufman, A. J., Yin, L. & Zhang, Y. 1997 Neoproterozoic fossils in Mesoproterozoic rocks? Precambrian Res. 84 , 197-220. (doi:10.1016/S03019268(97)00029-6) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knoll, A. H., Javaux, E. J., Hewitt, D., & Cohen, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2006-05-05
Volume
361
Issue
1470
Pages
1023-1038
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2133159913
Cited by
701
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 26
FWCI
11.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Platform voor marien onderzoek (Vlaams Instituut Voor De Zee) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
eukaryotic evolution, Ediacaran, taphonomy, fossil record, character evolution
MeSH terms
Eukaryotic Cells, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Oceans and Seas, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review