PreprintCited by 31COVID-19 epidemiological studiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resurgence of Omicron BA.2 in SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive Hong Kong

Open access

Abstract

After keeping infections at bay for two years, Hong Kong experienced a surge of Omicron BA.2 infections in early 2022 that overwhelmed the health care system, isolation facilities, and contact tracing capacity, leading to one of the highest per-capita death rates of COVID-19 in early 2022. The outbreak occurred against a backdrop of a dense population with low immunity towards natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, high vaccine hesitancy in vulnerable populations, comprehensive disease surveillance and the capacity for stringent public health and social measures. Using genome sequences and epidemiological data from this time, we reconstruct the epidemic trajectory of the BA.2 wave, estimate transmission and incidence rates, and evaluate the effectiveness of policy changes. We identify an increase in the effective reproductive rate (Re) to 9.5 in mid-January 2022, which preceded real-time estimates of transmission (Rt), revealing that BA.2 community transmission was under-ascertained weeks before the epidemic appeared to surge in mid-February 2022. Due to this, public health measures were relaxed in early February (Spring Festival) while Re increased and remained > 1 throughout February. An independent estimation of point prevalence and incidence using phylodynamics also indicates extensive superspreading at this time, which likely contributed to the rapid expansion of the epidemic. This study demonstrates that relying on Rt estimation methods dependent on case reporting can misinform epidemic response planning, sometimes with substantial consequences. There is a need for future research and implementation of improved estimates of epidemic growth in near real-time that combine multiple disparate data sources to better inform outbreak response policy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2107395/v1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. D24H@HKSTP & HKU WHO Collaborating Centre on Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Modelling (2022).
  2. Mefsin, Y. et al. Epidemiology of infections with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in Hong Kong, January-March 2022. medRxiv, 2022.2004.2007.22273595, doi:10.1101/2022.04.07.22273595 (2022). · DOI
  3. Adam, D. et al. Time-varying transmission heterogeneity of SARS and COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Research Square (2022).
  4. Modelling the fifth wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Source: https://www.med.hku.hk/en/news/press/-/media/DF5A2F6918764DC4B6517CE7B5F2796B.ashx (2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xie, R., Edwards, K. M., Adam, D. C., Leung, K. S. M., Tsang, T. K., Gurung, S., Xiong, W., Wei, X., Ng, D. Y. M., Liu, G. Y. Z., Krishnan, P., Chang, L. D. J., Cheng, S. M. S., Gu, H., Siu, G. K. H., Wu, J. T., Leung, G. M., Peiris, M., Cowling, B. J., Poon, L. L. M., & Dhanasekaran, V.
Affiliations
  • HKU-Pasteur Research Pole (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (HK)
  • Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK)
  • The University of Hong Kong
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-09-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
2422-2422
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367291784
Cited by
31
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (75N93021C00016)
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (T11-705/21-N)
  • Health and Medical Research Fund (COVID190205)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
Omicron BA.2, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 outbreak, Hong Kong, hotel quarantine, cross-infection, superspreading, public health and social measures, effective reproduction number, phylodynamics, point prevalence, epidemic trajectory, Chinese New Year, vaccine hesitancy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Hong Kong, Humans, Basic Reproduction Number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review