Cited by 360SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Vaccine effectiveness of one, two, and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong: a population-based observational study

Open access
McMenamin, Martina E, Nealon, Joshua, Lin, Yun, Wong, Jessica Y, Cheung, Justin K, Lau, Eric H Y, Wu, Peng, Leung, Gabriel M +1 more·2022·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background Hong Kong maintained low circulation of SARS-CoV-2 until a major community epidemic of the omicron (B.1.1.529) sublineage BA.2 began in January, 2022. Both mRNA (BNT162b2 [Fosun Pharma-BioNTech]) and inactivated CoronaVac (Sinovac, Beijing, China) vaccines are widely available; however, vaccination coverage has been low, particularly in older adults aged 70 years or older. We aimed to assess vaccine effectiveness in this predominantly infection-naive population. Methods In this observational study, we used individual-level case data on mild or moderate, severe or fatal, and fatal disease in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 along with census information and coverage data of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac. We used a negative binomial model, adjusting for age, sex, and calendar day to estimate vaccine effectiveness of one, two, and three doses of both BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines, and relative effectiveness by number of doses and vaccine type. Findings Between Dec 31, 2020, and March 16, 2022, 13·2 million vaccine doses were administered in Hong Kong's 7·4-million population. We analysed data from confirmed cases with mild or moderate (n=5566), severe or fatal (n=8875), and fatal (n=6866) COVID-19. Two doses of either vaccine protected against severe disease and death within 28 days of a positive test, with higher effectiveness among adults aged 60 years or older with BNT162b2 (vaccine effectiveness 89·3% [95% CI 86·6-91·6]) compared with CoronaVac (69·9% [64·4-74·6]). Three doses of either vaccine offered very high levels of protection against severe or fatal outcomes (97·9% [97·3-98·4]). Interpretation Third doses of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac provide substantial additional protection against severe COVID-19 and should be prioritised, particularly in older adults older than 60 years and others in high-risk populations who received CoronaVac primary schedules. Longer follow-up is needed to assess duration of protection across different vaccine platforms and schedules. Funding COVID-19 Vaccines Evaluation Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00345-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boosting by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac restores strong protection against hospitalization and death, but the incremental effectiveness of BNT162b2 boosters against such outcomes waned over 4-6 months for adults and the elderly.

    “Further, although boosting by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac restores strong protection against hospitalization and death33–35, the incremental effectiveness of BNT162b2 boosters against such outcomes waned over the course of 4–6 months34 for both adults and the elderly36.”

    From Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results report that three recent doses of either vaccine provided very high protection against severe disease and death, and that a third dose added protection in adults of all ages. But the Discussion says protection after third doses could be estimated only over a short period and that its duration was unclear; the paper does not establish waning of BNT162b2 booster effectiveness over 4–6 months. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]15. Suah JL Husin M Keng Tok PS Waning COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in Malaysia: an observational study medRxiv 2022 published online Jan 16. 10.1101/2022.01.15.22269326 (preprint). PMC8938298 35331933 · DOI
  2. [19]19. Mesfin Y Chen D Bond H Epidemiology of infections with SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.2 variant in Hong Kong, January–March 2022 medRxiv 2022 published online April 14. 10.1101/2022.04.07.22273595 (preprint). PMC9423929 35914518 · DOI
  3. [21]21. Chen L-L Syed MUA Chan W-M Contribution of low population immunity to the severe omicron BA.2 outbreak in Hong Kong Nat Portf 2022 published online April 14. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1512533/v1 (preprint). PMC9232516 35750868 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMenamin, M. E., Nealon, J., Lin, Y., Wong, J. Y., Cheung, J. K., Lau, E. H. Y., Wu, P., Leung, G. M., & Cowling, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Nealon, Joshua
  • Cowling, Benjamin J
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1435-1443
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285606826
Cited by
360
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 89
FWCI
41.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-09-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
  • Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • University Grants Committee (T11-712/19-N)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, BNT162b2, CoronaVac, vaccine effectiveness, booster vaccination, mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccine, Omicron variant, severe COVID-19, COVID-19 mortality, older adults, Hong Kong, vaccination coverage, vaccine prioritization, duration of protection
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, Aged, Hong Kong, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review