PreprintCited by 15Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyEscherichia coli research studiesBiochemical and Structural Characterization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure of a Rhs effector clade domain identifies new mechanistic insights into type VI secretion system toxin delivery.

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-52950-x · Paper page

Abstract

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a molecular machine utilised by many Gram-negative bacteria to deliver antibacterial toxins directly into adjacent bacteria, often providing a competitive advantage. Rearrangement hotspot (Rhs) effectors are known T6SS cargo effectors, but the precise delivery and activation of these toxins is poorly defined. We present the structure of a novel T6SS Rhs effector (Tse15) from the multidrug resistant nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Tse15 forms a triple layered β-cocoon Rhs domain with an N-terminal α-helical clade domain and an unfolded C-terminal toxin domain located entirely inside the Rhs cage. We identify that Tse15 is cleaved into three domains, through two independent auto-cleavage events involving aspartyl protease activity for toxin self-cleavage and a nucleophilic glutamic acid for the cleavage of the N-terminal clade domain. Proteomic analyses showed that the N-terminal clade and toxin domains, but not the β-strand rich Rhs cage, are delivered outside of the cell, suggesting a novel mechanism for Rhs toxin delivery and activation. Our findings suggest that this delivery mechanism requires an interaction between the N-terminal clade and toxin domains, with the clade domain acting as the internal chaperone to mediate tethering of the toxin to the T6SS machinery. Conservation of the clade domain in other Gram-negative bacteria suggest this may be a common mechanism for T6SS toxin delivery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3632996/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Basler M, Pilhofer M, Henderson GP, Jensen GJ, Mekalanos JJ (2012) Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail-like structure. Nature 483:182–186 · DOI
  2. Leiman PG et al (2009) Type VI secretion apparatus and phage tail-associated protein complexes share a common evolutionary origin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 4154–4159
  3. Cianfanelli FR, Monlezun L, Coulthurst SJ, Aim (2016) Load, Fire: The Type VI Secretion System, a Bacterial Nanoweapon. Trends Microbiol 24:51–62 · DOI
  4. Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Revel AT, Sturtevant D, Mekalanos JJ (2007) Type VI secretion system translocates a phage tail spike-like protein into target cells where it cross-links actin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 15508–15513
  5. Suarez G et al (2010) A Type VI Secretion System Effector Protein, VgrG1, from Aeromonas hydrophila That Induces Host Cell Toxicity by ADP Ribosylation of Actin. J Bacteriol 192:155–168 · DOI
  6. Hachani A, Wood TE, Filloux A (2016) Type VI secretion and anti-host effectors. Curr Opin Microbiol 29:81–93 · DOI
  7. Russell AB, Peterson SB, Mougous JD (2014) Type VI secretion system effectors: Poisons with a purpose. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:137–148 · DOI
  8. Durand E, Cambillau C, Cascales E, Journet L, VgrG (2014) Tae, Tle, and beyond: The versatile arsenal of Type VI secretion effectors. Trends Microbiol 22:498–507 · DOI
  9. Benz J, Sendlmeier C, Barends TRM, Meinhart A (2012) Structural Insights into the Effector – Immunity System Tse1/Tsi1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 7:e40453 · DOI
  10. Zhang H et al (2013) Structure of the Type VI Effector-Immunity Complex (Tae4-Tai4) Provides Novel Insights into the Inhibition Mechanism of the Effector by Its Immunity Protein. J Biol Chem 288:5928–5939 · DOI
  11. Hood RD et al (2010) A Type VI Secretion System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Targets a Toxin to Bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 7:25–37 · DOI
  12. Russell AB et al (2012) A Widespread Bacterial Type VI Secretion Effector Superfamily Identified Using a Heuristic Approach. Cell Host Microbe 11:538–549 · DOI
  13. Hachani A, Allsopp LP, Oduko Y, Filloux A (2014) The VgrG proteins are ‘à la carte’ delivery systems for bacterial type VI effectors. J Biol Chem 289:17872–17884 · DOI
  14. Ma J et al (2017) The Hcp proteins fused with diverse extended-toxin domains represent a novel pattern of antibacterial effectors in type VI secretion systems. Virulence 8:1189–1202 · DOI
  15. Whitney JC et al (2014) Genetically distinct pathways guide effector export through the type VI secretion system. Mol Microbiol 92:529–542 · DOI
  16. Diniz JA, Liu YC, Coulthurst SJ (2015) Molecular weaponry: Diverse effectors delivered by the Type VI secretion system. Cell Microbiol 17:1742–1751 · DOI
  17. Silverman JM et al (2013) Haemolysin Coregulated Protein Is an Exported Receptor and Chaperone of Type VI Secretion Substrates. Mol Cell 51:584–593 · DOI
  18. Liang X et al (2015) Identification of divergent type VI secretion effectors using a conserved chaperone domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 9106–9111
  19. Unterweger D et al (2015) Chimeric adaptor proteins translocate diverse type VI secretion system effectors in Vibrio cholerae. EMBO J 34:2198–2210 · DOI
  20. Carruthers MD, Nicholson PA, Tracy EN, Munson RS (2013) Acinetobacter baumannii Utilizes a Type VI Secretion System for Bacterial Competition. PLoS ONE 8, · DOI
  21. Ayobami O et al (2019) The incidence and prevalence of hospital-acquired (carbapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter baumannii in Europe, Eastern Mediterranean and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Microbes Infect 8:1747–1759 · DOI
  22. Fitzsimons TC et al (2018) Identification of Novel Acinetobacter baumannii Type VI Secretion System Antibacterial Effector and Immunity Pairs. Infect Immun 86:1–23 · DOI
  23. Lewis JM, Lucas D, Harper D, M., Boyce JD (2019) Systematic Identification and Analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii Type VI Secretion System Effector and Immunity Components. Front Microbiol 10:1–37 · DOI
  24. Jackson AP, Thomas GH, Parkhill J, Thomson NR (2009) Evolutionary diversification of an ancient gene family (rhs) through C-terminal displacement. BMC Genomics 10:584 · DOI
  25. Tang L et al (2022) Vibrio parahaemolyticus prey targeting requires autoproteolysis-triggered dimerization of the type VI secretion system effector RhsP. Cell Rep 41:111732 · DOI
  26. Pei T-T et al (2020) Intramolecular chaperone-mediated secretion of an Rhs effector toxin by a type VI secretion system. Nat Commun 11:1865 · DOI
  27. Koskiniemi S et al (2013) Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 7032–7037
  28. Busby JN, Panjikar S, Landsberg MJ, Hurst MRH, Lott JS (2013) The BC component of ABC toxins is an RHS-repeat-containing protein encapsulation device. Nature 501:547–550 · DOI
  29. Donato SL et al (2020) The β-encapsulation cage of rearrangement hotspot (Rhs) effectors is required for type VI secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 33540–33548
  30. Jurėnas D et al (2021) Mounting, structure and autocleavage of a type VI secretion-associated Rhs polymorphic toxin. Nat Commun 12:6998 · DOI
  31. Günther P et al (2022) Structure of a bacterial Rhs effector exported by the type VI secretion system. PLOS Pathog 18:e1010182 · DOI
  32. Holm L (2022) Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W210–W215 · DOI
  33. van Kempen M et al (2023) Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nat Biotechnol. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Jackson VA et al (2018) Structures of Teneurin adhesion receptors reveal an ancient fold for cell-cell interaction. Nat Commun 9:1–9 · DOI
  35. Pettersen EF et al (2004) UCSF Chimera: A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612 · DOI
  36. Bondage DD, Lin J-S, Ma L-S, Kuo C-H, Lai E-M (2016) VgrG C terminus confers the type VI effector transport specificity and is required for binding with PAAR and adaptor–effector complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113,
  37. Flaugnatti N et al (2020) Structural basis for loading and inhibition of a bacterial T6SS phospholipase effector by the VgrG spike. EMBO J 39, · DOI
  38. Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D (1998) A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 5752–5756
  39. Grant SG, Jessee J, Bloom FR, Hanahan D (1990) Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87, 4645–4649
  40. Adams MD et al (2008) Comparative genome sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol 190:8053–8064 · DOI
  41. Yang B et al (2012) Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat Methods 9:904–906 · DOI
  42. Li X et al (2013) Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat Methods 10:584–590 · DOI
  43. Rohou A, Grigorieff N (2015) CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 192:216–221 · DOI
  44. Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker MA (2017) cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat Methods 14:290–296 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Liebschner D et al (2019) Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Struct Biol 75:861–877 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Emsley P, Cowtan K, Coot (2004) model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126–2132 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Williams CJ et al (2018) MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27:293–315 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
McGowan, S., Hayes, B., Harper, M., Venugopal, H., Lewis, J., Wright, A., Steele, J., Steer, D., Schittenhelm, R., & Boyce, J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • McGowan, Sheena
  • Boyce, John
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-12-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
8709-8709
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403204445
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (LE120100090, LE200100045)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1165036, 1128981)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
type VI secretion system, Acinetobacter baumannii, toxin delivery, toxin secretion, Gram-negative bacteria, protein structure
MeSH terms
Type VI Secretion Systems, Protein Domains, Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Models, Molecular, Crystallography, X-Ray, Proteomics, Acinetobacter baumannii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review