PreprintCited by 139Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesGreen IT and SustainabilityMunicipal Solid Waste Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E-waste Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Wang, Peng, Zhang, Ling-Yu, Tzachor, Asaf, Masanet, Eric, Chen, Wei-Qiang·2024·Nature Computational Science

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s43588-024-00712-6

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), a subset of artificial intelligence, requires substantial computational hardware resources for data processing and model training. However, the electronic-waste (E-waste) toll of GAI remains underexplored and overlooked. Here, we propose a Computational Power-driven Material Flow Analysis (CP-MFA) model to measure GAI-related E-waste generation, with a specific focus on large language models. By quantifying server requirements and E-waste generation of GAI under different scenarios, we find that this emerging waste stream will grow at a rapid pace (16 million tons cumulative waste by 2030) with deleterious environmental impacts. Accordingly, we call for an early adoption of circular economy measures among server manufacturers and data center operators. This study reveals significant hardware-linked environmental implications in the context of GAI boom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3978528/v1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–139 of 139

Metadata

Authors
Wang, P., Zhang, L.-Y., Tzachor, A., Masanet, E., & Chen, W.-Q.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Peng
  • Tzachor, Asaf
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Published
2024-03-13
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
818-823
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403828159
Cited by
122
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 7
FWCI
33.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72274187, 71961147003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
electronic waste, generative AI, large language models, material flow analysis, computational power, circular economy, e-waste management, semiconductor supply chain, AI value chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review