PreprintCited by 2Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Novel, Potent Kv7 Channel Opener Azetukalner in Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder and Anhedonia: Neural Response to Reward, Clinical Outcomes, and Safety

Open access

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating disease. Kv7 potassium channels are relevant to reward processing and represent a novel target for depression and anhedonia. Azetukalner is a positive allosteric modulator of Kv7. This phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed changes in brain reward function, clinical outcomes, and safety following treatment with azetukalner or placebo in individuals with MDD and anhedonia. The study included 60 participants with MDD and anhedonia in a current major depressive episode. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive azetukalner (20 mg orally once daily with food) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in bilateral ventral striatum (VS) activity assessed by fMRI during a reward task from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in depression severity and anhedonia measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Of 60 participants, 29 were randomized to azetukalner and 31 to placebo. There was no significant difference in VS response to reward anticipation between groups. Compared to placebo, azetukalner was associated with numerical benefit on the MADRS and SHAPS that did not reach statistical significance. Additional exploratory endpoints also favored azetukalner over placebo. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low and did not differ across groups. Despite not meeting the primary neuroimaging endpoint,secondary and exploratory outcomes suggested potential improvement in depressive and anhedonia symptoms, consistent with recent studies. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04827901

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7448148/v1

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In major depressive disorder with prominent anhedonia, ezogabine produced meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms and improved reward sensitivity in randomized and open-label studies, with parallel changes in ventral striatal connectivity and reward learning.

    “In major depressive disorder with prominent anhedonia, ezogabine produced meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms and improved reward sensitivity in randomized and open-label studies, with parallel changes in ventral striatal connectivity and reward learning [259,260,261].”

    From Synaptic Plasticity—Intrinsic Excitability and Antidepressant Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [260]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (edgmont). 2007;4(7):28.
  2. Montgomery S, Asberg M. MADRS scale. Brit J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382–9.

Metadata

Authors
Murrough, J., Fremont, R., Neukam, P., Govindarajulu, U., Ables, J., Hameed, S., Corwin, M., Hargrove, M., Chang, H., Boukezzi, S., Kelly, C., Swann, A., Salas, R., Amarneh, D., Engelhardt, J., Weyland, A., Bagiella, E., Morris, L., & Mathew, S.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • BCM
Venue
Research Square
Published
2025-09-15
OpenAlex
W4414205348
Cited by
2
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Menninger Clinic
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001433)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R33MH111932)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
Kv7 potassium channels, major depressive disorder, anhedonia, reward processing, ventral striatum, positive allosteric modulators, antidepressant drug development, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review