Cited by 5Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Perspective-taking in families based on the social relations model

Open access
Ohtaka, Mizuka, Karasawa, Kaori·2019·THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Abstract

Although previous studies have verified that perspective-taking differs according to the individuals involved and their relationships, the balance between individual and relationship effects remains unclear. Thus, we examined perspective-taking in families based on the social relations model (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006). We conducted a triadic survey of 380 undergraduates and their fathers and mothers. We analyzed the triadic responses of the 166 families in which all three members completed the survey. It was found that perspective-taking in families is affected by the family itself, each actor, fathers as partners and all dyadic relationships. The relative contributions of individual effects and relationship effects differed between parent-child relationships and marital relationships. We discuss the implications of our findings for enhancing perspective-taking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2130/jjesp.1810

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roberts, B. W., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2004). On traits, situ- ations, and their integration: A developmental per- spective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 402-416.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohtaka, M., & Karasawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Yamanashi Gakuin University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Published
2019
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
111-115
ISSN
  • 0387-7973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-6276
OpenAlex
W2879239480
Cited by
5
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H03345)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
perspective taking, social relations model, family relationships, parent-child relationship, marital relationships, individual effects, relationship effects, triadic analysis, fathers, mothers, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review