The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cover Cropping to Reduce Nitrate Loss through Subsurface Drainage in the Northern U.S. Corn Belt
Abstract
Despite the use of best management practices for nitrogen (N) application rate and timing, significant losses of nitrate nitrogen NO−3–N in drainage discharge continue to occur from row crop cropping systems. Our objective was to determine whether a autumn‐seeded winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop following corn (Zea mays L.) would reduce NO−3–N losses through subsurface tile drainage in a corn–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cropping system in the northern Corn Belt (USA) in a moderately well‐drained soil. Both phases of the corn–soybean rotation, with and without the winter rye cover crop following corn, were established in 1998 in a Normania clay loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Haplustoll) soil at Lamberton, MN. Cover cropping did not affect subsequent soybean yield, but reduced drainage discharge, flow‐weighted mean nitrate concentration (FWMNC), and NO−3–N loss relative to winter fallow, although the magnitude of the effect varied considerably with annual precipitation. Three‐year average drainage discharge was lower with a winter rye cover crop than without (p = 0.06). Over three years, subsurface tile‐drainage discharge was reduced 11% and NO−3–N loss was reduced 13% for a corn–soybean cropping system with a rye cover crop following corn than with no rye cover crop. We estimate that establishment of a winter rye cover crop after corn will be successful in one of four years in southwestern Minnesota. Cover cropping with rye has the potential to be an effective management tool for reducing NO−3–N loss from subsurface drainage discharge despite challenges to establishment and spring growth in the north‐central USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource
Robertson, G. P., & Vitousek, P. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046 · Cited by 1,177
Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation
Lehman, R., Cambardella, C., Stott, D., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D., Buyer, J., Maul, J., Smith, J., Collins, H., Halvorson, J., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010988 · Cited by 449
Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems:A Global Meta‐Analysis
Thapa, R., Mirsky, S. B., & Tully, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107 · Cited by 377
McClelland, S. C., Paustian, K., & Schipanski, M. E. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2278 · Cited by 268
Cellulosic biofuel potential of a winter Rye double crop across the U.S. corn–soybean belt
Feyereisen, G. W., Camargo, G. G. T., Baxter, R. E., Baker, J. M., & Richard, T. L. (2013) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0282 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Strock, J. S., Porter, P. M., & Russelle, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1010-1016
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2058213315
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cover Cropping to Reduce Nitrate Loss through Subsurface Drainage in the Northern U.S. Corn Belt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2004.1010
- The paper
- Strock, J. S., Porter, P. M., & Russelle, M. P. (2004). Cover Cropping to Reduce Nitrate Loss through Subsurface Drainage in the Northern U.S. Corn Belt. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.1010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.