Life-cycle assessment of the beef cattle production system for the northern Great Plains, USA
Abstract
A life-cycle assessment (LCA) model was developed to estimate the environmental impacts associated with four different U.S. Northern Great Plains (NPG) beef production systems. The LCA model followed a "cradle-to-gate" approach and incorporated all major unit processes, including mineral supplement production. Four distinct operation scenarios were modeled based on production strategies common to the NGP, and a variety of impacts were determined. The scenarios include a normal operation, early weaning of the calf, fast-tack backgrounding, and grassfed. Enteric emissions and manure emissions and handling were consistently the largest contributors to the LCA impacts. There was little variability between production scenarios except for the grassfed, where the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 37% higher due to a longer finishing time and lower finishing weight. However, reductions to GHG emissions (15-24%) were realized when soil organic carbon accrual was considered and may be a more realistic estimate for the NGP. Manure emissions and handing were primary contributors to potential eutrophication and acidification impacts. Mitigation strategies to reduce LCA impacts, including diet manipulation and management strategies (i.e., treatment of manure), were considered from a whole-systems perspective. Model results can be used for guidance by NGP producers, environmental practitioners, and policymakers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different assumptions about fertilization rates on pasture have resulted in a 5-fold difference in N2O emissions.
“For example, different assumptions about fertilization rates on pasture have resulted in a 5fold difference in N 2 O emissions”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Several life cycle assessment studies have concluded that grass-finished beef systems have greater greenhouse gas intensities than feedlot-finished beef systems.
“Using life cycle analysis (LCA), several studies have concluded that grass-finished beef systems have greater GHG intensities than feedlot-finished (FL) beef systems.”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
The few studies that considered low rates of soil carbon sequestration in greenhouse gas accounting for beef production indicated potential emissions decreases of 24-535%.
“The few studies that considered low rates of soil C sequestration in GHG accounting for beef production indicated potential emissions decreases of 24-535%”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Tertiary emissions from manufacture of machines, equipment, and infrastructure were excluded based on their assumed minor contributions.
“Tertiary emissions, including those from manufacture of machines, equipment, and infrastructure were excluded, based on their assumed minor contributions”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Studies have identified gaps and called for more robust research and inclusion of soil carbon in future life cycle assessment models.
“Studies have identified these gaps and have called for more robust research and inclusion of soil C in future LCA models”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Adaptive multi-paddock grazed steers finished in 150 days shorter and 99 kg heavier than the continuously grazed steers in Lupo et al. (2013).
“Our AMP-grazed steers finished in 150 days shorter and 99 kg heavier than the continuously grazed steers in Lupo et al. (2013).”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Average finishing weights for the feedlot steers were similar to those reported by others.
“Average finishing weights for the FL steers (Table 2) were similar to those reported by others”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
GHG emissions (per kg CW) were within the range of those reported in other studies for the Northern Great Plains, Upper Midwest, and California within the U.S.
“Generally, GHG emissions (per kg CW) were within the range of those reported in other studies for the Northern Great Plains (Lupo et al., 2013), Upper Midwest (Pelletier et al., 2010), andCalifornia (Stackhouse-Lawson et al., 2012) within the U.S.”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Application of manure produced in the FL in the present study offset 31.4% of N fertilizer application, which is lower than the 69% used in the study of Lupo et al. (2013).
“Application of manure produced in the FL in the present study offset 31.4% of N fertilizer application, which is lower than the 69% used in the study of Lupo et al. (2013).”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al. (2013)
In beef LCA studies from the Northern Great Plains and the Upper Midwest in which soil C dynamics were estimated, hypothetical C sequestration rates of 0.41 and 0.12 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 reduced emissions from continuous grass-fed beef production by 24% and 30%, respectively.
“In beef LCA studies from the Northern Great Plains and the Upper Midwest in which soil C dynamics were estimated, hypothetical C sequestration rates of 0.41 and 0.12 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 reduced emissions from continuous grass-fed beef production by 24% and 30%, respectively (Lupo et al., 2013;Pelletier et al., 2010).”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Manure CH4 and N2O for the FL scenario estimated in this study were greater than those in other studies (Lupo et al., 2013; Pelletier et al., 2010).
“Manure CH 4 and N 2 O for the FL scenario estimated in this study were greater than those in other studies (Lupo et al., 2013;Pelletier et al., 2010).”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Feed production emissions in the FL finishing scenario were slightly greater than those reported by Lupo et al. (2013) and Pelletier et al. (2010).
“Feed production emissions in the FL finishing scenario were slightly greater than those reported by Lupo et al. (2013) and Pelletier et al. (2010), likely because our FL ration included only a small proportion of legume forages and a larger proportion of DDGS and corn grain which have greater emissions per kg than other feedstuffs (Camargo et al., 2013).”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lupo et al. (2013)
Attempts to measure grazing-induced changes in SOC and incorporate them into LCAs have been sparse in the literature and have yielded widely variable results.
“Attempts to measure grazing-induced changes in SOC and incorporate them into LCAs have been sparse in the literature and have yielded widely variable results (Lupo et al., 2013;Mehre et al., 2024;Pelletier et al., 2010;Rowntree et al., 2020; see SI Section A.3.4 for a direct comparison with these studies).”
From Impact of 10 years of adaptive multi-paddock grazing on soil carbon and beef's greenhouse gas footprint in the US Upper Midwest (2026) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Grass-finished carcass weights are ∼33% lower than existing grain-finishing beef LCAs.
“Importantly, these results show that grass-finished CWs are ∼33% lower than existing grain-finishing beef LCAs (Pelletier et al., 2010b;Lupo et al., 2013;Stanley et al., 2018).”
From Ecosystem Impacts and Productive Capacity of a Multi-Species Pastured Livestock System (2020) · cites this paper as Lupo et al., 2013
Cites
Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) budget of nine European grassland sites
Soussana, J. F., Allard, V., Pilegaard, K., Ambus, P., Amman, C., Campbell, C., Ceschia, E., Clifton-Brown, J., Czobel, S., Domingues, R., et al. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.022 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Management effects on soil C storage on the Canadian prairies
Janzen, H. H., Campbell, C. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Ellert, B. H., Juma, N., McGill, W. B., & Zentner, R. P. (1998) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00105-6 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Beauchemin, K. A., Henry Janzen, H., Little, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & McGinn, S. M. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: a review of life cycle assessments
de Vries, M., van Middelaar, C. E., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2015) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.020 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Stanley, P. L., Rowntree, J. E., Beede, D. K., DeLonge, M. S., & Hamm, M. W. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
“GHG emissions from the manufacture of mineral supplements for rations were predicted using methodology of Lupo et al. (2013) and were scaled to represent the difference in finishing time for both finishing systems.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEcosystem Impacts and Productive Capacity of a Multi-Species Pastured Livestock System
Rowntree, J. E., Stanley, P. L., Maciel, I. C. F., Thorbecke, M., Rosenzweig, S. T., Hancock, D. W., Guzman, A., & Raven, M. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.544984 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Berton, M., Agabriel, J., Gallo, L., Lherm, M., Ramanzin, M., & Sturaro, E. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.005 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Garcia, L., Stanley, P. L., Sacramento, J. P., Dillon, J. A., Thorbecke, M., Thompson, L. R., Ambike, V., Sharma, P., Xu, S., Chiavegato, M. B., et al. (2026) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104879 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lupo, C. D., Clay, D. E., Benning, J. L., & Stone, J. J.
- Affiliations
- South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
- South Dakota State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stone, James J.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1386-1394
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003247290
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- South Dakota Corn Growers Association
- South Dakota State University
- U.S. NASA EPSCoR (NNX07AL04A)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- beef cattle production, environmental impact, greenhouse gas emissions, manure management, soil organic carbon, early weaning, eutrophication, acidification, Northern Great Plains, mitigation measures
- MeSH terms
- Red Meat, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Carbon Dioxide, Cattle, Environment, Manure, Models, Theoretical, Greenhouse Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review