The DOI matches its Crossref record; 182 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions?
Open accessAbstract
A good statistical analysis of genotype × environment interactions (G × E) is a key requirement for progress in any breeding program. Data for G × E analyses traditionally come from multi‐environment trials. In recent years, increasingly data are generated from managed stress trials, phenotyping platforms, and high throughput phenotyping techniques in the field. Simultaneously, and complementary to the phenotyping, more elaborate genotyping and envirotyping occur. All of these developments further increase the importance of a sound statistical framework for analyzing G × E. This paper presents considerations on such a framework from the point of view of the choices that need to be made with respect to the content of short academic courses on statistical methods for G × E. Based on our experiences in teaching statistical methods to plant breeders, for specialized G × E courses between three and 5 d are reserved. The audience in such courses includes MSc students, PhD students, postdocs, and researchers at breeding companies. For such specialized courses, we propose a collection of topics to be covered. Our outlook on G × E analyses is two‐fold. On the one hand, we see the G × E problem as the building of predictive models for genotype‐specific reaction norms. On the other hand, the G × E problem consists in the identification of suitable variance‐covariance models to describe heterogeneity of genetic variance and correlations across environments. Our preferred class of statistical models is the class of mixed linear‐bilinear models. These statistical models allow us to answer breeding questions on adaptation, adaptability, stability, and the identification and subdivision of the target population of environments. By a citation analysis of the literature on G × E, we show that our preference for mixed linear‐bilinear models for analyzing G × E is supported by recent trends in the types of methods for G × E analysis that are most frequently cited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties1
Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183x000600010011x · Cited by 3,680
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme
Finlay, K., & Wilkinson, G. (1963) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9630742 · Cited by 3,165
The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis
GABRIEL, K. R. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.453 · Cited by 3,037
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. (2000) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0300-6 · Cited by 2,646
Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses
Fischer, R., & Maurer, R. (1978) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9780897 · Cited by 2,295
Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate
Nicotra, A. B., Atkin, O. K., Bonser, S. P., Davidson, A. M., Finnegan, E. J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M. D., Richards, C. L., Valladares, F., et al. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008 · Cited by 2,196
Cultivar Evaluation and Mega‐Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot
Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x · Cited by 1,977
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Atlin G.N., 2011, Managing genotype by environment interaction in plant breeding programs: A selection theory approach, J. Indian Soc. Agric. Stat., 65, 237
- Butler R.C., 1993, Nonlinear contrasts in ANOVA, Genstat Newsletter, 29, 20
- 10.1080/00949659708811837 · doi:10.1080/00949659708811837
- 10.2307/2531644 · doi:10.2307/2531644
- 10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241
- 10.1038/hdy.1987.124 · doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.124
- 10.1007/BF00285245 · doi:10.1007/bf00285245
- Integrated Breeding Platform, 2015, The IBP breeding management system. Version 3.0.8
- Jolliffe I.T., 2013, Principal component analysis. Springer
- Lerner I.M., 1954, Genetic homeostasis
- Lin C.S., 1988, A method of analyzing cultivar x location x year experiments: A new stability parameter, Theor. Appl. Genet., 76, 425, 10.1007/BF00265344 · doi:10.1007/bf00265344
- Milliken G.A., 1989, Analysis of messy data: Nonreplicated experiments
- Podlich D.W., 1999, Simulated evolution and learning SE‐23. Lecture notes in computer science, 171
- SAS Institute, 2015, SAS/STAT
- Schlichting C.D., 1998, MA
- 10.1007/s10681-006-9208-2 · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9208-2
- 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x · doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x
- 10.2134/agronj13.0405 · doi:10.2134/agronj13.0405
- VSN International, 2015, GenStat
- VSN International, 2015, ASREML for R. Version 3.0
- VSN International, 2015, ASREML for Windows. Version 4.0
- 10.1201/b17336 · doi:10.1201/b17336
- Woltereck R., 1909, Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziel über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphnien. Verhandlungen der Dtsch, Zool. Gesellschaft, 110
- Wricke G., 1962, Uber eine methode zur erfassung der okologischen streubreite in feldversuchen, Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung, 47, 92
- Wricke G., 1966, A biometric method of comprehending the environmental adaptation, (English translation.) Qualitas Plantarum et Materiae Vegetabiles, 13, 318
- 10.1201/9781420040371 · doi:10.1201/9781420040371
- Yin X., 2000, A generic equation for nitrogen‐limited leaf area index and its application in crop growth models for predicting leaf senescence, Ann. Bot., 85, 579, 10.1006/anbo.1999.1104 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1104
Cited by
Olivoto, T., Lúcio, A. D. C., da Silva, J. A. G., Marchioro, V. S., de Souza, V. Q., & Jost, E. (2019) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220 · Cited by 490
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos-Korts, D., Millet, E. J., Boer, M. P., Kruijer, W., Thompson, A., Malosetti, M., Iwata, H., Quiroz, R., Kuppe, C., et al. (2019) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.018 · Cited by 217
Self-citationCooper, M., Messina, C. D., Tang, T., Gho, C., Powell, O. M., Podlich, D. W., Technow, F., & Hammer, G. L. (2022) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9781119874157.ch8 · Cited by 56
How process-based modeling can help plant breeding deal with G x E x M interactions
Hajjarpoor, A., Nelson, W. C. D., & Vadez, V. (2022) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108554 · Cited by 35
On to the next chapter for crop breeding: Convergence with data science
Ersoz, E. S., Martin, N. F., & Stapleton, A. E. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20054 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos‐Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2119-2140
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2509715244
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 182
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375
- The paper
- van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos‐Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M. (2016). What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions? Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.