Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 182 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions?

Open access
van Eeuwijk, Fred A., Bustos‐Korts, Daniela V., Malosetti, Marcos·2016·Crop Science

Abstract

A good statistical analysis of genotype × environment interactions (G × E) is a key requirement for progress in any breeding program. Data for G × E analyses traditionally come from multi‐environment trials. In recent years, increasingly data are generated from managed stress trials, phenotyping platforms, and high throughput phenotyping techniques in the field. Simultaneously, and complementary to the phenotyping, more elaborate genotyping and envirotyping occur. All of these developments further increase the importance of a sound statistical framework for analyzing G × E. This paper presents considerations on such a framework from the point of view of the choices that need to be made with respect to the content of short academic courses on statistical methods for G × E. Based on our experiences in teaching statistical methods to plant breeders, for specialized G × E courses between three and 5 d are reserved. The audience in such courses includes MSc students, PhD students, postdocs, and researchers at breeding companies. For such specialized courses, we propose a collection of topics to be covered. Our outlook on G × E analyses is two‐fold. On the one hand, we see the G × E problem as the building of predictive models for genotype‐specific reaction norms. On the other hand, the G × E problem consists in the identification of suitable variance‐covariance models to describe heterogeneity of genetic variance and correlations across environments. Our preferred class of statistical models is the class of mixed linear‐bilinear models. These statistical models allow us to answer breeding questions on adaptation, adaptability, stability, and the identification and subdivision of the target population of environments. By a citation analysis of the literature on G × E, we show that our preference for mixed linear‐bilinear models for analyzing G × E is supported by recent trends in the types of methods for G × E analysis that are most frequently cited.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 182 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Atlin G.N., 2011, Managing genotype by environment interaction in plant breeding programs: A selection theory approach, J. Indian Soc. Agric. Stat., 65, 237
  2. Butler R.C., 1993, Nonlinear contrasts in ANOVA, Genstat Newsletter, 29, 20
  3. 10.1080/00949659708811837 · doi:10.1080/00949659708811837
  4. 10.2307/2531644 · doi:10.2307/2531644
  5. 10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241
  6. 10.1038/hdy.1987.124 · doi:10.1038/hdy.1987.124
  7. 10.1007/BF00285245 · doi:10.1007/bf00285245
  8. Integrated Breeding Platform, 2015, The IBP breeding management system. Version 3.0.8
  9. Jolliffe I.T., 2013, Principal component analysis. Springer
  10. Lerner I.M., 1954, Genetic homeostasis
  11. Lin C.S., 1988, A method of analyzing cultivar x location x year experiments: A new stability parameter, Theor. Appl. Genet., 76, 425, 10.1007/BF00265344 · doi:10.1007/bf00265344
  12. Milliken G.A., 1989, Analysis of messy data: Nonreplicated experiments
  13. Podlich D.W., 1999, Simulated evolution and learning SE‐23. Lecture notes in computer science, 171
  14. SAS Institute, 2015, SAS/STAT
  15. Schlichting C.D., 1998, MA
  16. 10.1007/s10681-006-9208-2 · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9208-2
  17. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x · doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4151461x
  18. 10.2134/agronj13.0405 · doi:10.2134/agronj13.0405
  19. VSN International, 2015, GenStat
  20. VSN International, 2015, ASREML for R. Version 3.0
  21. VSN International, 2015, ASREML for Windows. Version 4.0
  22. 10.1201/b17336 · doi:10.1201/b17336
  23. Woltereck R., 1909, Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziel über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphnien. Verhandlungen der Dtsch, Zool. Gesellschaft, 110
  24. Wricke G., 1962, Uber eine methode zur erfassung der okologischen streubreite in feldversuchen, Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung, 47, 92
  25. Wricke G., 1966, A biometric method of comprehending the environmental adaptation, (English translation.) Qualitas Plantarum et Materiae Vegetabiles, 13, 318
  26. 10.1201/9781420040371 · doi:10.1201/9781420040371
  27. Yin X., 2000, A generic equation for nitrogen‐limited leaf area index and its application in crop growth models for predicting leaf senescence, Ann. Bot., 85, 579, 10.1006/anbo.1999.1104 · doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1104

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos‐Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
2119-2140
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2509715244
Cited by
286
References
182
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375
The paper
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos‐Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M. (2016). What Should Students in Plant Breeding Know About the Statistical Aspects of Genotype × Environment Interactions? Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.