The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in a Dryland Cropping System
Abstract
No‐till (NT) increases the potential to crop more frequently in the Great Plains than with the conventional‐till (CT) crop–fallow farming system. More frequent cropping requires N input to maintain economical yields. We evaluated the effects of N fertilization on crop residue production and its subsequent effects on soil organic C (SOC) and total soil N (TSN) in a dryland NT annual cropping system. Six N rates (0, 22, 45, 67, 90, and 134 kg N ha −1 ) were applied to the same plots from 1984 through 1994, except 1988 when rates were reduced 50%, on a Weld silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Argiustoll). Spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), corn ( Zea mays L.), winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and oat ( Avena sativa L.)–pea ( Lathyrus tingitanus L.) hay were grown in rotation. Crop residue production varied with crop and year. Estimated average annual aboveground residue returned to the soil (excluding hay years) was 2925, 3845, 4354, 4365, 4371, and 4615 kg ha −1 , while estimated annual contributions to belowground (root) residue C were 1060, 1397, 1729, 1992, 1952, and 2031 kg C ha −1 for the above N rates, respectively. The increased amount of crop residue returned to the soil with increasing N rate resulted in increased SOC and TSN levels in the 0‐ to 7.5‐cm soil depth after 11 crops. The fraction of applied N fertilizer in the crop residue decreased with increasing N rate. Soil bulk density ( D b ) in the 0‐ to 7.5‐cm soil depth decreased as SOC increased. The increase in SOC with N fertilization contributes to improved soil quality and productivity, and increased efficiency of C sequestration into the soil. Carbon sequestration can be enhanced by increasing crop residue production through adequate N fertility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen
Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., & Long, J. H. (1990) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020026x · Cited by 652
Cited by
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
Lal, R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2185 · Cited by 1,413
A review of nitrogen fertilizer and conservation tillage effects on soil organic carbon storage
Alvarez, R., & Alvarez, R. (2005) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1079/sum2005291 · Cited by 444
LU, F., WANG, X., HAN, B., OUYANG, Z., DUAN, X., ZHENG, H., & MIAO, H. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x · Cited by 434
Crop Management for Soil Carbon Sequestration
Jarecki, M. K., & Lal, R. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713608318 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Halvorson, A. D., Reule, C. A., & Follett, R. F.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 912-917
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2006890615
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in a Dryland Cropping System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj1999.634912x
- The paper
- Halvorson, A. D., Reule, C. A., & Follett, R. F. (1999). Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in a Dryland Cropping System. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634912x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.