The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Achieving Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration with Conservation Agricultural Systems in the Southeastern United States
Abstract
Conservation management of degraded land has the potential to build soil fertility, restore soil functions, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of surface soil organic matter accumulation. Literature from the southeastern United States was reviewed and synthesized to: (i) quantitatively evaluate the magnitude and rate of soil organic C (SOC) sequestration with conservation agricultural management; (ii) evaluate how conservation management affects surface SOC accumulation and its implications on ecosystem services; and (iii) recommend practical soil sampling strategies based on spatial and temporal issues to improve the detection of statistically significant SOC sequestration. Soil organic C sequestration was 0.45 ± 0.04 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 (mean ± standard error, n = 147, 20 ± 1 cm depth, 11 ± 1 yr) with conservation tillage compared with conventional tillage cropland. Establishment of perennial pastures sequestered 0.84 ± 0.11 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ( n = 35, 25 ± 2 cm depth, 17 ± 1 yr). Stratification of SOC with depth was common under conservation agricultural management and appears to be integrally linked to abatement of soil erosion, improvement in water quality, and SOC sequestration. Sampling of conservation management systems should ideally occur repeatedly with time in controlled and replicated experiments, but there is also an urgent need for chronosequence and paired‐field surveys of SOC on working farms in the region to validate and expand the scope of inference of experimental results. Landowners in the southeastern United States have great potential to restore soil fertility and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions with the adoption of and improvement in conservation agricultural systems (e.g., continuous no‐till, high‐residue crop rotations, high organic matter inputs).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215
Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle
Schlesinger, W. H., & Andrews, J. A. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006247623877 · Cited by 1,773
Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00018-1 · Cited by 937
Self-citationSix, J., Ogle, S. M., Jay breidt, F., Conant, R. T., Mosier, A. R., & Paustian, K. (2004) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00730.x · Cited by 878
Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2002) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(02)00027-2 · Cited by 834
Self-citationRapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest
Richter, D. D., Markewitz, D., Trumbore, S. E., & Wells, C. G. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21867 · Cited by 638
GREGORICH, E., ROCHETTE, P., VANDENBYGAART, A., & ANGERS, D. (2005) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.02.009 · Cited by 473
Dolan, M. S., Clapp, C. E., Allmaras, R. R., Baker, J. M., & Molina, J. A. E. (2006) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.07.015 · Cited by 395
Predictive Quality of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Bulk Density of Forest Soils
De Vos, B., Van Meirvenne, M., Quataert, P., Deckers, J., & Muys, B. (2005) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0500 · Cited by 347
Cited by
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.-S., Cheng, K., Das, B. S., et al. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002 · Cited by 2,239
“…Canada 0–30 cm 0.46 to 0.72 75 *20 years VandenBygaart et al. (2008) Conversion of annual cropland to grassland USA (southeast) 0–25 ± 2 cm 0.84 ± 0.11 Not reported 17 ± 1 years Franzluebbers (2010) Conversion to improved grazing USA 0–50 cm 0.41 40.1 ± 5.6 3–25 years Conant et al. (2003)…”
BackgroundInfluentialUnderstanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation
Lehman, R., Cambardella, C., Stott, D., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D., Buyer, J., Maul, J., Smith, J., Collins, H., Halvorson, J., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010988 · Cited by 449
German, R. N., Thompson, C. E., & Benton, T. G. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12251 · Cited by 144
Enhancing ecosystem services with no-till
Lal, R. (2013) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170512000452 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Franzluebbers, A. J.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 347-357
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2062232103
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 35.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration with Conservation Agricultural Systems in the Southeastern United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2009.0079
- The paper
- Franzluebbers, A. J. (2010). Achieving Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration with Conservation Agricultural Systems in the Southeastern United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.