The Treatment Effect of School Exclusion on Unemployment
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Fixed-term school exclusions are disciplinary sanctions on pupils in response to serious aggressive or disruptive behaviour in schools. It is unclear whether these sanctions aggravate future problems. Here we assess what impact fixed term exclusions have on later unemployment. Methods: We use data from the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE), a prospective cohort study of over 15,000 adolescents. We treat school exclusion as an ‘intervention’ and apply propensity score matching to assess whether it has a treatment effect on unemployment. Results: We find a consistent difference between excluded and non-excluded children in their likelihood of being unemployed at aged 18/19. This effect ranges between 6-16 percentage points depending on the methodological approach taken. Conclusions: Our results suggest an independent effect of school exclusion on the probability of being unemployed two years later, over and above numerous baseline individual/family characteristics. To truly understand the effect exclusion has on young people, we suggest that high-quality cluster randomised trials are needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of exclusion as a deterrent.
“Sutherland and Eisner (2014) highlighted the lack of empirical evidence supporting the use of exclusion as a deterrent.”
From School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Sutherland and Eisner 2014
Cites
Waasdorp, T. E. (2012) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.755 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Multilevel evaluation of factors predicting school exclusion among middle and high school students
Theriot, M. T., Craun, S. W., & Dupper, D. R. (2010) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.009 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review
Valdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., Arosemena‐Burbano, M. J., Hitchcock, S., Jolliffe, D., & Sutherland, A. (2025) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.70063 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationValdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., & Jolliffe, D. (2023) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1344 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sutherland, A., & Eisner, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sutherland, Alex
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2402237961
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
- Keywords
- school exclusion, student discipline, youth unemployment, adolescent behavior, disruptive behavior, treatment effects, Longitudinal Study of Young People in England
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review