Cited by 121Education Discipline and InequalityLegal Issues in EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Multilevel evaluation of factors predicting school exclusion among middle and high school students

Theriot, Matthew T., Craun, Sarah W., Dupper, David R.·2010·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.009

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theriot, M. T., Craun, S. W., & Dupper, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Theriot, Matthew T.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
13-19
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033679658
Cited by
121
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
school exclusion, school suspension, expulsion, student misbehavior, student discipline, poverty, junior high school students, high school students, school environment, multilevel analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review