PreprintCited by 195Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationArtificial Intelligence in Law

Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Roadmap

Open access
Calo, Ryan·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3015350

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calo has identified justice and equity, use of force, safety and certification, privacy, power, taxation, and displacement of labour as key challenges of AI.

    “Calo in his paper has identified - justice and equity, use of force, safety and certification, privacy, power, taxation and displacement of labour as the key challenges of AI (Calo, 2017).”
  • The fear of the emergence of superintelligence is more frequently expressed by people who lack technical experience in the field of AI, while 'real' experts generally regard the idea of a strong AI as rather absurd.

    “In this context, it is noteworthy that the fear of the emergence of superintelligence is more frequently expressed by people who lack technical experience in the field of AI-one just has to think of people like Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk or Bill Gates-while 'real' experts generally regard the idea of a strong AI as rather absurd (Calo 2017, 26).”

    From The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020) · cites this paper as Calo 2017

  • AI industry ethics guidelines serve to suggest to legislators that internal self-governance in science and industry is sufficient and that no specific laws are necessary to mitigate technological risks and eliminate abuse scenarios.

    “Ethics guidelines of the AI industry serve to suggest to legislators that internal self-governance in science and industry is sufficient, and that no specific laws are necessary to mitigate possible technological risks and to eliminate scenarios of abuse (Calo 2017).”

    From The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020) · cites this paper as Calo 2017

  • AI laws are starting to germinate in the United States.

    “AI laws are starting to germinate in the United States.”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Privacy (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

  • Legal experts concerned with AI governance criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI's ethical and social issues.

    “Legal experts concerned with AI governance issues criticize ethical principles as flawed and inadequate in addressing AI’s ethical and social issues.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calo, R.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Calo, Ryan
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767123365
Cited by
191
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
AI policy, algorithmic fairness, algorithmic justice, algorithmic accountability, use of force, AI safety, AI certification, privacy, taxation, job displacement, institutional configuration, public procurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review