PreprintCited by 7Wastewater Treatment and ReuseWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis

Investigate the Effect of Effective Microorganism (EM) on Improving the Quality of Sewage Water from Al-Gabal Al-Asfar Area in Egypt

Open access
El Shafei, Maha, Abd Elmoteleb, Enas·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3164096

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Shafei, M., & Abd Elmoteleb, E.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3107465721
Cited by
7
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
effective microorganisms, wastewater treatment, biological wastewater treatment, BOD removal, COD removal, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, nitrate removal, chloride removal, coliform removal, fecal coliforms, dissolved oxygen, pH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review