PreprintCited by 2Public Procurement and PolicyLegal and Labor StudiesE-Government and Public Services

EU Public Procurement Policy and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Pushing and Pulling as One?

Open access
Sanchez-Graells, Albert·2019·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2139/ssrn.3440554

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI is a promising instrument to increase human well-being, bringing progress and innovation, and achieve sustainable goals that benefit society as a whole.

    “it is a promising instrument to increase human well-being, bringing progress and innovation, and achieve sustainable goals that benefit society as a whole.128”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchez-Graells, A.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013571910
Cited by
2
References
5
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
public procurement policy, Fourth Industrial Revolution, e-procurement, market access, EU trade policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review