Cited by 14Education and Military IntegrationHigher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

You Can't Handle the Truth: The Effects of the Post-9/11 Gi Bill on Higher Education and Earnings

Open access
Barr, Andrew, Kawano, Laura, Sacerdote, Bruce, Skimmyhorn, William, Stevens, Michael·2021·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3889130

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects of the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefit expansion on earnings 7 to 9 years after separation from the military are negative, suggesting that any return to the additional schooling is outweighed by the loss of working experience.

    “Effects on earnings 7 to 9 years after separation from the military are negative, suggesting that any return to the additional schooling is outweighed by the loss of working experience.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Barr et al. (2021)

  • Null or negative earnings effects of financial aid despite positive enrollment effects occurred in contexts where induced enrollment was primarily at for-profit institutions.

    “Similarly, two papers finding null or negative earnings effects of financial aid, even despite positive enrollment effects, occurred in contexts in which the induced enrollment was primarily at for-profit institutions (see, e.g.Barr et al., 2021 on the PGIB veterans benefits, and Gurantz, 2022 on Competitive Cal Grants for nontraditional students).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Barr et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barr, A., Kawano, L., Sacerdote, B., Skimmyhorn, W., & Stevens, M.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • United States Department of the Treasury (US)
Corresponding author
Barr, Andrew
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185282861
Cited by
14
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Smith Richardson Foundation
  • Sid W. Richardson Foundation
  • W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
  • Boston College
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • George Washington University
  • National Academy of Education
  • U.S. Military Academy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
Post-9/11 GI Bill, veterans, college enrollment, graduation, earnings effects, education subsidies, vocational skills, labor market experience, military veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review