PreprintCited by 4Climate Change Policy and EconomicsMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon Market Design and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

Open access
Perino, Grischa·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Beliefs about future allowance prices in cap-and-trade schemes are heterogeneous and not necessarily fully informed. This paper shows how carbon-market design affects the impact of noise traders on equilibrium prices. Price-based flexibility mechanisms encourage arbitrage by rational traders and limit the impact of noise traders. The Market Stability Reserve (MSR) of the EU ETS that adjusts supply based on past allowance banking discourages arbitrage by rational traders undermining self-stabilizition of the carbon market. The design proposed by the European Commission as part of the ’Fit for 55’ package reduces the responsiveness of rational traders to that of noise-traders. The MSR increases vulnerability of the EU ETS to market sentiments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4243350

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in the marginal intake rate may also aggravate MSR impacts on price stability and make its asymmetric potency in reducing supply versus expanding it even more prevalent.

    “The increase in the marginal intake rate may also aggravate MSR impacts on price stability (Gerlagh et al. 2022, Perino 2022) and make its asymmetric potency in reducing supply versus expanding it even more prevalent (Quemin 2022).”
  • A banking-based mechanism such as the MSR undermines market self-stabilizing forces because it induces effective supply curves that are downward sloping.

    “Perino (2022) shows how a banking-based mechanism such as the MSR undermines market self-stabilizing forces (i.e., rational responses to dampen noisy price moves through arbitrage) because it induces effective supply curves that are downward sloping.”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Perino, G.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Perino, Grischa
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312851396
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
carbon market design, self-fulfilling prophecy, noise traders, emissions trading, allowance prices, Market Stability Reserve, EU Emissions Trading System, allowance banking, arbitrage, Fit for 55, market sentiment, heterogeneous beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review