Cited by 49Climate Change Policy and EconomicsMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFinance, Markets, and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Financials threaten to undermine the functioning of emissions markets

Open access
Quemin, Simon, Pahle, Michael·2023·Nature Climate Change

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-022-01560-w

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Allowance markets are seldom studied from a financial market perspective or with frameworks using a market microstructure of heterogeneous agents with different trading motives and behaviors.

    “allowance markets are seldom studied from a financial market perspective or with frameworks using a market microstructure of heterogeneous agents with different trading motives and behaviors (Friedrich et al. 2020b, Quemin & Pahle 2023).”

    From The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as Quemin & Pahle 2023

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jeszke, R. & Lizak, S. Reflections on the mechanisms to protect against formation of price bubble in the EU ETS market. Environ. Protect. Nat. Resour. 32, 8–17 (2021).
  2. Bouleau, N. Limits to growth and stochastics. Real World Econ. Rev. 60, 92–106 (2012).
  3. Zaklan, A. Coase and cap-and-trade: evidence on the independence property from the European carbon market. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy (in the press).
  4. Martin, R., Muûls, M. & Wagner, U. J. in Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument: Evaluation and Prospects (eds Gronwald, M. & Hintermann, B.) Ch. 9 (MIT Press, 2015).
  5. Working, H. Speculation on hedging markets. Food Res. Inst. Stud. 1, 185–220 (1960).
  6. Burtraw, D., Holt, C., Palmer, K. & Shobe, W. Price-responsive allowance supply in emissions markets. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9, 851–884 (2022).
  7. Literature Review on Position Limits (CFTC, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Quemin, S., & Pahle, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
  • Leibniz Association (DE)
Corresponding author
Quemin, Simon
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2022-12-29
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
22-31
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W4313332608
Cited by
49
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the Kopernikus-Projekt Ariadne (FKZ 03SFK5A).
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Finance, Markets, and Regulation
Keywords
emissions trading, speculation, financial trading, EU Emissions Trading System, market oversight, carbon pricing, emission limits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review